Uncovering Reflections of Preclinical Medical Students from Clinical Shadowing: A Thematic Analysis

Clinical shadowing(CS) offers preclinical medical students the opportunity to observe certified physicians in practice. Analyzing the content of students' reflective writings(RWs) to understand core competencies they perceived during CS, as well as stages of their reflections, can offer valuable insights for course design and instructor guidance. This study aimed to address this matter by employing a thematic analysis of students' RWs to explore the learning outcomes derived from CS.

The dataset of the thematic analysis comprised de-identified RWs from preclinical medical students who participated in the clinical shadowing program during the first semester of the 2019 academic year at National Taiwan University College of Medicine. Two researchers independently extracted and categorized pertinent content from the texts of RWs, aligning them with the six core competencies of ACGME and mapping them to the stages of Kolb's learning cycle. Additionally, correlation with shadowing specialties and fields was investigated.

In total, 155 RWs were analyzed. Patient care emerged as the most frequently reflected competency(30%), followed by systems-based practice(23%), and medical knowledge(21%). The shadowing specialties and fields had an impact on the core competencies students perceived. In terms of Kolb's learning stages, concrete experience(66%) predominated in RWs, while abstract conceptualization(19%) and reflective observation(14%) were less prevalent. For each competency, concrete experience was the prevailing stage, with active experimentation being the least dominant one. Students exhibited varying proportions of reflections at different stages for each core competency.

Clinical shadowing experiences enable preclinical medical students to explore required clinical core competencies, with emphases depending on the shadowing specialties and fields. Currently, most reflections are concentrated at Kolb's concrete experience stage. This study offers valuable insights for designing future CS programs and improving faculty development, aimed at helping students achieve deeper and more comprehensive reflective learning in relation to core competencies, and even professional identity.