Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2025
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer
Published on: April 17, 2012
3D-printed brachytherapy in patients with cervical cancer: improving efficacy and safety outcomes
Zenghong Lu1, Gangfeng Zhu2, Zhengang Qiu1
1Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, 341000, Jiangxi Province, China.
Objective:
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 3D printing technology in brachytherapy for cervical cancer, comparing its outcomes with conventional free hand implantation brachytherapy.
Methods:
A total of 50 cervical cancer patients treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical College from January 2019 to July 2023 were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: 25 patients received intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) combined with 3D-printed brachytherapy, and 25 patients underwent IMRT combined with free hand brachytherapy implantation. Key indicators analyzed included short-term therapeutic effects, survival outcomes, operation times, the number of CT scans, the number of needles inserted, dosimetric parameters, and complications.
Results:
The use of 3D-printed brachytherapy significantly improved the safety of radiation therapy operations, especially for large tumors (≥ 30 mm), by providing more precise dose distribution and reducing the radiation doses received by critical organs such as the bladder and rectum. Compared to the artificial implant group (88% prevalence), the 3D-printed brachytherapy group showed a significantly lower incidence of radiation enteritis (29.2% prevalence, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in other complications between the two groups. For instance, the incidence of radiation cystitis was relatively high in the 3D-printed brachytherapy group (79.2% prevalence) compared to the artificial implant group (64% prevalence, p = 0.240). The median follow-up period in this study was 22.5 months [IQR 18-29]. Among the 49 patients included, 43 had cervical squamous carcinoma and 6 had cervical adenocarcinoma. Short-term therapeutic response rates were comparable, with no significant difference in overall survival observed between the two groups.
Conclusion:
3D-printed brachytherapy offers a more effective and safer therapeutic option for patients with cervical cancer, particularly for those with large tumors or complex anatomical structures.
