Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds
Published on: September 26, 2017
A geographically weighted neural network model for digital soil mapping of heavy metal copper in coastal cities
Yun Zeng1, Tiezhu Shi1, Qian Liu2
1School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China; State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building and Urban Science & Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Joint Laboratory for Smart Cities & MNR Key Laboratory for Geo-Environmental Monitoring of Great Bay Area & Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urban Informatics, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.
Abstract:
Assessing the spatial distribution of heavy metals in soil is essential for mitigating risks to human health and ensuring the sustainable use of soil resources. This study proposed a geographically weighted neural network (GWNN) model, leveraging deep learning and geographically weighted regression (GWR). The model was designed based on the GWR concept to address the spatial autocorrelation of copper (Cu) in soil and incorporated convolutional neural network (CNN) to capture the nonlinear relationships between Cu and environmental covariates. The GWNN model was compared with GWR, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and artificial neural network (ANN) models. XGBoost was employed to select important environmental covariates and spatial autocorrelation of Cu concentrations was assessed using Moran's I. The model's performance was evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation, and prediction uncertainty was quantified with 100 bootstrap models. The results indicated that temperature covariates were the most significant predictors of soil Cu concentrations. The R2 values for Cu prediction accuracy were 0.60 for GWNN, 0.53 for ANN, 0.49 for XGBoost, and 0.32 for GWR. The spatial distribution of Cu showed a trend of higher concentrations in the north and lower concentrations in the south, consistent with spatial clusters identified by local Moran's I. The mean uncertainty of the 90 % confidence interval for GWNN was 16.49 %, closely aligning with XGBoost (15.44 %) and ANN (16.29 %) and significantly outperforming the GWR (18.25 %). Overall, the GWNN model demonstrated strong predictive accuracy and low uncertainty, offering an improved approach for digital soil mapping applications.
More Related Videos
09:44Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon
Published on: October 16, 2018
12:03Two-Dimensional Visualization and Quantification of Labile, Inorganic Plant Nutrients and Contaminants in Soil
Published on: September 1, 2020