Association of phenotypic age and accelerated aging with severity and disability in patients with acute ischemic
Yongkang Liu1, Jiangchuan Wang1, Zicheng Wei1
1Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China.
Objective:
Biological age may be more accurate than chronological age in determining chronic health outcomes. However, few studies have shown the association between biological age and acute ischemic stroke (AIS). In this study we showed the association between phenotypic age (PhenoAge) or accelerated aging and severity and disability in patients with AIS.
Design:
Retrospective study.
Setting And Subjects:
936 patients with AIS during January 2019 to July 2021 and 512 patients during June 2022 to July 2023 for a validation.
Methods:
Stroke severity was evaluated based on the National Institute of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) questionnaire scale. Disability was evaluated by modified Rankin Scale. PhenoAge was calculated based on chronological age and 9 clinical chemistry biomarkers. Logistic regression analyses were applied to estimate the relationship between PhenoAge and the severity and disability.
Results:
PhenoAge (odds ratio [OR] = 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-1.04, for NIHSS ≥ 5; OR = 1.05, 95%CI: 1.03-1.07, for NIHSS ≥ 10) was independently associated with stroke severity. The probability of NIHSS ≥ 5 or NIHSS ≥ 10 was significantly increased in individuals with accelerated ageing versus individuals with no accelerated aging (age gap: OR = 1.79, 95%CI: 1.18-2.72; OR = 3.53, 95%CI: 1.60-7.77; phenotypically older vs. phenotypically younger: OR = 2.01, 95%CI: 1.21-3.35; OR = 3.69, 95%CI: 1.36-10.0). Similar trends was observed when accelerated aging was defined by residual discrepancies between PhenoAge and chronological age (OR = 1.02, 95%CI: 1.01-1.04, for NIHSS ≥ 5; OR = 1.05, 95%CI: 1.02-1.08, for NIHSS ≥ 10). The area under the curve of PhenoAge was higher than that of chronological age in identifying patients with NIHSS ≥ 5 (0.66, 95%CI:0.62-0.70 vs. 0.61, 95%CI: 0.58-0.65, p < 0.01) and NIHSS ≥ 10 (0.69, 95%CI:0.60-0.77 vs. 0.63, 95%CI: 0.55-0.72, p = 0.05). The probability of severe disability was significantly increased in individuals with accelerated aging versus individuals with no accelerated aging (age gap: OR = 2.87, 95%CI: 1.09-7.53; phenotypically older vs. phenotypically younger: 4.88 (1.20-19.88). Similar results were observed in the validation population.
Conclusion:
PhenoAge or accelerated aging is associated with stroke severity and disability even after adjusting for chronological age.
More Related Videos
09:11Performing Permanent Distal Middle Cerebral with Common Carotid Artery Occlusion in Aged Rats to Study Cortical Ischemia with Sustained Disability
Published on: February 23, 2016
04:46Author Spotlight: Innovative Techniques and Future Directions in Stroke Research
Published on: May 5, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacodynamics in Geriatric Patients: Effects of Age
Ischemic Stroke l: Introduction
Ischemic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology
Alzheimer Disease l: Introduction
Dementia l: Introduction
