Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Rejection of Fluorescence Background in Resonance and Spontaneous Raman Microspectroscopy
Published on: May 18, 2011
On the greenness of separation modes containing compressed fluids
Troy T Handlovic1, M Farooq Wahab1, Bailey C Glass1
1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Arlington, USA.
Greenness evaluations of liquid chromatography (LC) methods, including supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) and enhanced fluidity liquid chromatography (EFLC), must consider instrument cycle time. A modified Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) reveals that SFC and EFLC are not always the greenest options for environmental analysis.
Area of Science:
- Analytical Chemistry
- Environmental Science
- Green Chemistry
Background:
- Liquid chromatography (LC) traditionally uses toxic organic solvents, posing environmental, health, and safety concerns.
- Supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) and enhanced fluidity liquid chromatography (EFLC) are promoted as greener alternatives to traditional reversed-phase (RPLC) and normal-phase (NPLC) methods.
- Quantitative greenness evaluations are crucial to validate the environmental benefits of different chromatographic techniques.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantitatively assess the
- To critically evaluate the greenness of various LC modes, including SFC and EFLC, by incorporating instrument cycle time into the assessment.
- To provide analytical chemists with a tool for selecting the most environmentally friendly separation methods.
Main Methods:
- Modification of the Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) to include instrument cycle time.
- Application of the first-order optimality condition (AMGS gradient = 0) to determine optimal greenness.
- Comparative analysis of different LC modes using the modified AMGS metric.
Main Results:
- Supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) and enhanced fluidity liquid chromatography (EFLC) are not consistently the greenest chromatographic options.
- Instrument cycle time significantly impacts the overall greenness score, altering perceptions of flow rate efficiency.
- The separation of tobacco alkaloid enantiomers demonstrated the utility of the modified metric across various retention phenomena.
Conclusions:
- The modified AMGS metric provides a practical tool for analytical chemists to assess the environmental impact of their separation methods.
- This methodology helps identify the greenest separation conditions for routine chemical analysis by considering instrument cycle time.
- Informed decisions regarding chromatographic method selection can be made to minimize environmental burden.
Related Concept Videos
Accelerating Fluids
The motion of the liquid within this infinitesimal cylinder is considered to obtain the pressure difference. Three vertical forces act on this liquid:
Types of Fluids
In contrast, non-Newtonian fluids do not follow Newton's law of viscosity, and...
Steady, Laminar Flow Between Parallel Plates
Density, Specific Weight, Specific Gravity and Compressibility of Fluid
Specific weight represents the weight per unit volume and is calculated by multiplying...
Pressure Variation in a Fluid at Rest
When measuring pressure at two different levels within the fluid, the difference in...
Vapor Pressure of Fluid
When a liquid is placed in a closed container with a small air space, and the space is evacuated, vapor molecules will...

