Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2025

The MODS method for diagnosis of tuberculosis and multidrug resistant tuberculosis
Published on: August 11, 2008
Microbiological aspects and clinical impact of lower lung field tuberculosis: An observational cohort study in Peru
Qi Tan1, Chuan-Chin Huang2, Roger Calderon3
1Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Objectives:
Approximately 40% of tuberculosis (TB) cases remain undiagnosed globally. Lower lung field TB (LLF TB) presents atypically and is often misidentified as other lung diseases, leading to diagnostic delays in resource-limited settings. It may contribute to increased TB transmission and mortality. We aimed to identify microbiological determinants of LLF TB and evaluate treatment responses to optimize care.
Methods:
We conducted an observational cohort study in Lima, Peru, enrolling adults with microbiologically confirmed pulmonary TB (PTB) diagnosed by GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay or sputum culture. Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) lineage was determined using whole-genome sequencing. Due to the delayed chest radiograph changes in LLF TB compared to non-LLF TB, we measured changes in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score at 2-month treatment mark and evaluated World Health Organization-specified final treatment outcomes. We used logistic regression to evaluate the associations between LLF TB and microbiological determinants and treatment outcomes. We used linear regression to assess whether the change in SGRQ scores over the first 2 months of treatment varied by LLF TB status.
Results:
Among 1316 PTB patients, 84 (6%) had LLF TB. Compared to non-LLF TB patients, LLF TB patients were more likely to be smear-negative (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] [95% CI] = 2.04 [1.28-3.23], P = 0.002) and to be infected with Lineage 2 (aOR [95% CI] = 1.95 [95% CI: 1.07-3.41; P = 0.024]). People with LLF TB had less improvement in SGRQ scores after 2 months of treatment (adjusted score difference [95% CI] = -6.29 [-10.99 to -1.59], P = 0.009), while they experienced better final outcomes compared to non-LLF TB patients, though this difference did not reach statistical significance (aOR = 0.43 [95% CI: 0.13-1.05], P = 0.103).
Conclusion:
Patients with LLF TB are more likely than those with upper lung lesions to be sputum-negative on conventional tests, to be infected with Lineage 2, and to show less clinical improvement after treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Tuberculosis IV
Several diagnostic approaches are used to detect TB. The conventional method is the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), also known as the Mantoux test. However, this method has...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis I
Causative Organism
The primary infectious agent causing tuberculosis is Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a slow-growing, acid-fast, aerobic rod that exhibits sensitivity to heat and ultraviolet light. Instances of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium contributing to the development of TB infection are rare.
Mode of...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis V
Latent tuberculosis infection occurs when TB bacteria are present in a person's body, but are not causing illness or symptoms. It is not contagious, and preventive treatment is crucial to avoid the...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis II
Here is a detailed explanation of its pathophysiology:
Transmission: The process begins when a person inhales droplet nuclei containing M. tuberculosis. These are typically released into the air when an individual with pulmonary or...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis III
The first classification is based on the development of the disease, and it includes the following categories:

