Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2025

06:40
Screening of Axonal Degeneration in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Using Ultrasonography and Nerve Conduction Studies
Published on: January 11, 2019
11.6K
Screening for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: Subjective Versus Objective Measures
Stephanie Pleven1, Nikolaos Papanas2, Alfred Gatt1,3
1Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds
|November 4, 2024
Summary
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) screening using subjective tools varies in sensitivity. Objective measures like the NC-Stat DPNCheck® are recommended for comprehensive diabetic foot screening.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Diabetology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common complication of diabetes, increasing the risk of foot ulcers and amputations.
- Current diabetic foot screening guidelines often rely on subjective sensory tests.
- The diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of these subjective tools for DPN detection can vary.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of various subjective screening modalities for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) against an objective measure.
- To evaluate the NC-Stat DPNCheck®, an automated sural nerve conduction test, as an objective tool for DPN screening.
- To assess the sensitivity and diagnostic differences among commonly used subjective DPN screening tools.
Main Methods:
- Sixty-three participants with diabetes were evaluated using multiple subjective screening tools: Semmes-Weinstein 10-g monofilament, 128-Hz traditional tuning fork, neurothesiometer, and O'Brien 128-Hz electronic tuning fork.
- Results from subjective tests were compared with objective measurements obtained from the NC-Stat DPNCheck®.
- Statistical analysis was performed to identify significant differences in DPN classification between the screening methods.
Main Results:
- A statistically significant difference (P < .05) was observed in the number of limbs classified as having DPN across all tested screening modalities.
- This indicates variability in sensitivity among the subjective screening tools for detecting DPN.
- The study highlights potential discrepancies in DPN diagnosis depending on the screening method employed.
Conclusions:
- Subjective screening modalities recommended in diabetic foot screening guidelines exhibit varying sensitivity for DPN detection.
- The findings underscore the importance of utilizing multiple screening tools for a thorough assessment of a patient's neurological status in diabetes.
- Incorporating objective measures, such as the NC-Stat DPNCheck®, into routine diabetic foot screening is recommended, and further research is needed to establish a gold standard diagnostic tool for DPN.

