Atrial cardiomyopathy: An entity of emerging interest in the clinical setting
Giuseppe Boriani1, Luigi Gerra1, Marta Mantovani1
1Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Insights
Atrial cardiomyopathy (ACM) involves myocardial fibrosis and increases thromboembolic risk, even without atrial fibrillation (AF). Current diagnostic methods lack a gold standard, necessitating clinical criteria for better therapeutic understanding.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pathology
Background:
- Atrial cardiomyopathy (ACM) has been linked to myocardial fibrosis since 1995, yet its definition relies heavily on histopathology.
- Assessing thromboembolic risk from ACM alone is challenging due to its complex interplay with atrial fibrillation (AF).
- ACM's thrombogenicity arises from electrical, functional, and structural atrial changes, influenced by various cardiovascular and extracardiac conditions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the diagnostic challenges and current understanding of atrial cardiomyopathy (ACM).
- To highlight the need for standardized clinical criteria for ACM diagnosis.
- To explore the therapeutic implications of atrial structural and functional changes, independent of atrial fibrillation (AF).
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on atrial cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation, and thromboembolic events.
- Analysis of diagnostic modalities including ECG, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and electro-anatomical mapping (EAM).
- Evaluation of clinical trial data regarding anticoagulation in ACM patients without AF.
Main Results:
- ACM is associated with myocardial fibrosis and increased thromboembolic risk, independent of AF.
- Current diagnostic methods (ECG, echocardiography, CMR, EAM) assess electrical, structural, and functional atrial changes but lack a gold standard.
- Recent trials show no benefit of oral anticoagulation in ACM patients without AF, despite ACM being a substrate for AF development.
Conclusions:
- There is a critical need for defined clinical criteria for diagnosing ACM.
- Understanding ACM's pathophysiology is crucial for managing thromboembolic risk, even in the absence of AF.
- Further research is needed to establish diagnostic standards and guide therapeutic strategies for ACM.
Abstract:
Since 1995, the concept of atrial cardiomyopathy (ACM) has been associated with myocardial fibrosis. Despite a consensus document in 2016, ACM's definition primarily relies on histopathological findings. The focus on diagnostic criteria for ACM is driven by the potential link to thromboembolic events even independently on atrial fibrillation (AF). The complexity of the mutual relationships between ACM and AF makes difficult any assessment of the thromboembolic risk associated to ACM per se. ACM's thrombogenicity is a multifaceted clinical phenomenon involving electrical, functional, and structural modifications. Factors such as cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., hypertension), common cardiac comorbidities (e.g., heart failure), and extracardiac conditions (e.g., neuromuscular disorders) can promote atrial derangement, triggering atrial fibrillation (AF) and increasing the risk of thromboembolic events. Several diagnostic methods are available to detect the key features of ACM, including electrical changes assessed by surface and intracavitary ECG, and structural and functional alterations evaluated through echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). These methods can be complemented by electro-anatomical mapping (EAM) to enhance the accuracy of myocardial tissue characterization and assessment of atrial fibrosis. Although certain clinical conditions (e.g., atrial high-rate episodes, AHREs; embolic stroke of undetermined source, ESUS) often exhibit atrial alterations in their thromboembolic presentations, recent randomized trials have failed to demonstrate the benefits of oral anticoagulation in patients with ACM without AF. However, ACM constitutes the substrate for the development of AF, as proposed in the AF European guidelines under the 4S-AF scheme. This review emphasizes the lack of a diagnostic gold standard and the need for clinical criteria for ACM, aiming to better understand the potential therapeutic implications of atrial structural and functional derangements, even in the absence of clinical evidence of AF.
More Related Videos
08:31Isolation of Atrial Cardiomyocytes from a Rat Model of Metabolic Syndrome-related Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: July 26, 2018
08:52Author Spotlight: Developing a Translational Model for Atrial Fibrillation Research Across Species
Published on: November 21, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Myocarditis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Myocarditis I: Introduction
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Pulmonary Hypertension: Classification and Pathogenesis
There are various classifications for PH, each relating to different underlying causes and also...
Pathophysiology of Cardiac Performance
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
