Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2025

The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Flow Dynamic Factors Correlated With Device-Related Thrombosis After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion
Brennan J Vogl1, Emily Vitale1, Sunyoung Ahn1
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan, USA.
Insights
Device-related thrombosis (DRT) after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a risk. Lower wall shear stress and higher oscillatory shear index predict DRT, suggesting flow dynamics can guide risk stratification.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Device-related thrombosis (DRT) complicates up to 4% of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) procedures.
- The exact causes, predictors, and optimal treatments for DRT remain unclear, necessitating further research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the correlation between hemodynamic factors and the occurrence of DRT following LAAO.
- To identify specific flow dynamics that may predict DRT risk in patients undergoing LAAO.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a multicenter registry of patients who underwent LAAO with pre- and post-procedure CT imaging.
- Created patient-specific 3D models of the left atrium for finite element and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations.
- Quantified hemodynamic parameters: time-averaged wall shear stress, oscillatory shear index, and endothelial cell activation potential.
Main Results:
- Compared 19 patients with DRT to 19 without, finding larger left atrium volumes and mitral valve areas in the DRT group.
- Patients with DRT exhibited significantly lower time-averaged wall shear stress and higher oscillatory shear index and endothelial cell activation potential (P < 0.001).
- In-vivo thrombus locations correlated well with CFD-derived flow dynamic parameters.
Conclusions:
- Hemodynamic parameters derived from CFD simulations show potential for predicting DRT risk after LAAO.
- Further large-scale studies with long-term follow-up are required to validate CFD's role in risk stratification for LAAO patients.
Background:
Device-related thrombosis (DRT) occurs in up to 4% of patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. However, its pathophysiology, predictors, and optimal management remain unclear.
Objectives:
This study aims to assess flow dynamic factors correlating to DRT.
Methods:
A multicenter registry of patients who underwent LAAO and had pre- and post-computed tomography imaging was used. Patient-specific 3-dimensional digital models of the left atrium were created, and finite element simulations were performed to implant an LAAO device into each model in a position that matched the clinical deployment. Computational fluid dynamic simulations were performed to quantify the following flow dynamic parameters: time averaged wall shear stress, oscillatory shear index, and endothelial cell activation potential.
Results:
A total of 38 patients (19 with DRT and 19 without DRT) were included. Left atrium volumes and mitral valve areas were larger in the DRT cohort compared with controls. Patients with DRT had a significantly lower time averaged wall shear stress (1.76 ± 1.24 Pa vs 2.90 ± 2.70 Pa), a higher oscillatory shear index (0.19 ± 0.11 vs 0.17 ± 0.11), and a higher endothelial cell activation potential (0.23 ± 0.58 Pa-1 vs 0.17 ± 0.30 Pa-1) than the controls (P < 0.001 for all). Thrombus locations identified from in-vivo images correlated well with the flow dynamic parameters tested.
Conclusions:
Flow dynamic parameters may be able to predict the risk of DRT after LAAO. Further investigation with a larger patient cohort and long-term follow-up is needed to assess the role of computational fluid dynamics in the risk stratification of patients considered for LAAO.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Clot Retraction and Fibrinolysis
Disorders of Hemostasis
Thromboembolic Disorders
Two factors primarily cause thromboembolic conditions.

