Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Prostate cancer and chip specimens: complete versus partial sampling.

R T Vollmer

    Human Pathology
    |March 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Use of modifying phrases in surgical pathology reports: is there a different understanding between pathologists and treating physicians?

    Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology·2022
    Same author

    Disparate results between proliferation rates of surgically excised prostate tumors and an in vitro bioassay using sera from a positive randomized controlled trial.

    Biotechnic & histochemistry : official publication of the Biological Stain Commission·2014
    Same author

    Prostate biopsies from black men express higher levels of aggressive disease biomarkers than prostate biopsies from white men.

    Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases·2011
    Same author

    Prognostic value of various morphometric measurements of tumour extent in prostate needle core tissue.

    Histopathology·2008
    Same author

    The relative importance of anatomic and PSA factors to outcomes after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

    American journal of clinical pathology·2002
    Same author

    Serum markers, myocardial marker content, and infarct size.

    American journal of clinical pathology·2001

    Optimal prostate cancer detection in transurethral prostatectomy specimens can be achieved with five tissue blocks. This economical method identifies approximately 90% of prostate cancers, including aggressive forms.

    Area of Science:

    • Uropathology
    • Oncology
    • Surgical Pathology

    Background:

    • Accurate cancer detection in prostatectomy specimens is crucial for patient prognosis.
    • Current sampling methods for transurethral prostatectomy (TURP) specimens may not capture all malignancies.
    • Gleason grading and clinical staging are key indicators of prostate cancer aggressiveness.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the efficacy of different tissue sampling strategies for transurethral prostatectomy specimens.
    • To determine an optimal, economical method for detecting prostate cancer in these specimens.

    Main Methods:

    • A retrospective review of 850 routine prostatectomy specimens over nine years.
    • Complete microscopic examination of all submitted tissue.
    • Analysis of cancer detection rates based on the number of tissue blocks submitted.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Sixty-one prostate cancers were identified in 711 previously undiagnosed cases.
    • Forty-nine cancers were found in glands not clinically suspected.
    • Submitting five tissue blocks detected approximately 90% of cancers, including high-grade and advanced-stage tumors.

    Conclusions:

    • A five-block sampling strategy for transurethral prostatectomy specimens is economical and effective for detecting most prostate cancers.
    • This method reliably identifies aggressive cancers (Gleason pattern 4 or 5) and clinically staged cancers.
    • Complete tissue examination may be unnecessary for detecting all focal cancers, as it may not significantly impact patient prognosis.