The effect of lipidomes on the risk of endometrioid endometrial cancer: a Mendelian randomization study

This study aimed to explore the potential effects between various human plasma lipidomes and endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) by using Mendelian randomization (MR) methods.

This study designated a total of 179 human plasma lipidomes from the genome-wide association study (GWAS) database as the exposure variable. An EEC-related dataset from the GWAS (GCST006465) served as the outcome variable. MR analyses used the inverse variance-weighted method (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode methods for regression calculations, accounting for possible biases induced by linkage disequilibrium and weak instrument variables. Any lipidomes failing to pass heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy tests were deemed to lack significant causal impact on the outcome.

The results of IVW analysis disclosed that a variety of human plasma lipidomes (n = 15) exhibited a significant causal effect on EEC (p < 0.05). A subset of these lipidomes (n = 13) passed heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy tests, which demonstrated consistent and viable causal effects (p < 0.05) including glycerophospholipids, glycerolipids, and sterols. Specifically, phosphatidylcholine (odds ratio [OR]: 1.065-1.129, p < 0.05) exhibited a significant positive causal effect on the occurrence of EEC. Conversely, sterol ester (OR = 0.936, p = 0.007), diacylglycerol (OR = 0.914, p = 0.036), phosphatidylcholine (OR: 0.903-0.927, p < 0.05), phosphatidylethanolamine (OR = 0.907, p = 0.046) and triacylglycerol (OR: 0.880-0.924, p < 0.05) showed a notable negative causal association with EEC, suggesting their inhibitory effects on the EEC occurrence.

The study revealed that human plasma lipidomes have complex impacts on EEC through Mendelian randomization. This indicated that the diversity of structural changes in lipidomes could show different effects on subtypes and then affect EEC occurrence. Although these lipids had the potential to be promising biomarkers, they needed to be further clinically validated nevertheless.