Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Non-equilibrium in the Cell01:16

Non-equilibrium in the Cell

4.2K
An important concept in studying metabolism and energy is that of chemical equilibrium. Most chemical reactions are reversible. They can proceed in both directions, releasing energy into their environment in one direction, and absorbing it from the environment in the other direction. The same is true for the chemical reactions involved in cell metabolism, such as the breaking down and building up of proteins into and from individual amino acids, respectively. Reactants within a closed system...
4.2K
Altruism01:03

Altruism

40.9K
Altruistic behaviors are “unselfish” behaviors—those that help another individual at the expense of the individual carrying out the behavior. Despite the negative consequences for the altruistic animal, these behaviors are thought to have evolved for several reasons.
40.9K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

22.9K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
22.9K
Biodiversity and Human Values01:24

Biodiversity and Human Values

13.0K
Human civilization relies on biodiversity in many ways. Sudden changes in species biodiversity result in environmental changes that can modify weather patterns and therefore human civilizations.
13.0K
What is Genetic Engineering?00:49

What is Genetic Engineering?

73.7K
Overview
73.7K
Pleiotropy01:33

Pleiotropy

39.9K
Pleiotropy is the phenomenon in which a single gene impacts multiple, seemingly unrelated phenotypic traits. For example, defects in the SOX10 gene cause Waardenburg Syndrome Type 4, or WS4, which can cause defects in pigmentation, hearing impairments, and an absence of intestinal contractions necessary for elimination. This diversity of phenotypes results from the expression pattern of SOX10 in early embryonic and fetal development. SOX10 is found in neural crest cells that form melanocytes,...
39.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Incorporating brain-inspired mechanisms for multimodal learning in artificial intelligence.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Spiking world model with multicompartment neurons for model-based reinforcement learning.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

AI disclosure, moral shame, and the punishment of honesty.

Accountability in research·2025
Same author

Artificial intelligence risks, attention allocation and priorities.

Journal of medical ethics·2024
Same author

Brain-inspired neural circuit evolution for spiking neural networks.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023
Same author

Self-backpropagation of synaptic modifications elevates the efficiency of spiking and artificial neural networks.

Science advances·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.9K

Allowing AI co-authors is a disregard for humanization.

Aorigele Bao1,2,3,4, Yi Zeng1,2,3,4

  • 1Department of Philosophy, School of Humanities, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Accountability in Research
|November 4, 2024
PubMed
Summary

AI should not be a coauthor because it diminishes the human writing experience and leads to self-deception about rationality. Granting AI coauthorship disregards humanization in academic and creative work.

Keywords:
AI coauthorshipauthorship ethicshumanizationself-deception

More Related Videos

Depletion of Mouse Cells from Human Tumor Xenografts Significantly Improves Downstream Analysis of Target Cells
07:10

Depletion of Mouse Cells from Human Tumor Xenografts Significantly Improves Downstream Analysis of Target Cells

Published on: July 29, 2016

12.6K
Generation of Human Chimeric Antigen Receptor Regulatory T Cells
10:29

Generation of Human Chimeric Antigen Receptor Regulatory T Cells

Published on: January 3, 2025

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.9K
Depletion of Mouse Cells from Human Tumor Xenografts Significantly Improves Downstream Analysis of Target Cells
07:10

Depletion of Mouse Cells from Human Tumor Xenografts Significantly Improves Downstream Analysis of Target Cells

Published on: July 29, 2016

12.6K
Generation of Human Chimeric Antigen Receptor Regulatory T Cells
10:29

Generation of Human Chimeric Antigen Receptor Regulatory T Cells

Published on: January 3, 2025

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Technology
  • Artificial Intelligence Ethics
  • Writing Studies

Background:

  • The paper addresses the question of why artificial intelligence (AI) cannot be a coauthor.
  • It introduces a less-discussed reason behind this limitation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the implications of AI coauthorship on the human experience of writing.
  • To examine the potential for self-delusion regarding AI's capabilities and human rationality.
  • To discuss the consequences of AI coauthorship on the concept of humanization in authorship.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of AI's role in the writing process.
  • Examination of the author-text relationship when AI is involved.
  • Ethical considerations of granting AI coauthor status.

Main Results:

  • Allowing AI as a coauthor devalues the human author's unique experience and critical thinking.
  • It reduces the author-text relationship to a probabilistic and gamified interaction.
  • This practice can lead to self-delusion about one's own rationality and understanding of the world.

Conclusions:

  • Including AI as a coauthor signifies a disregard for humanization in intellectual and creative endeavors.
  • The study highlights the importance of preserving the human element in authorship.