Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Measurement of Ultrafast Vibrational Coherences in Polyatomic Radical Cations with Strong-Field Adiabatic Ionization
Published on: August 6, 2018
Vibronic coherent quantum beat in four-layer platinum carbonyl cluster
Shufan Xiao1, Jianwei Zou1, Zhuowei Hou1
1College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People's Republic of China.
Abstract:
Vibronic coherence has been studied for years, but direct comparisons between the rich experimental features and theory remain rare. In this work, we investigate the vibronic coherent quantum beat of a four-layer platinum carbonyl cluster [Pt3(CO)6]42- in a solution utilizing femtosecond vis-pump/vis-probe transient absorption spectroscopy. By varying the excitational wavelength, quantum beats coupled to either the electronic ground state or the excited state are selectively prepared. A 41 cm-1 beat at the ground state with a phase flip at 615 nm and a 28 cm-1 beat at the excited state with a phase node at 735 nm are observed. The beat amplitudes are asymmetric, stronger on the red side for ground state beats but weaker for excited state beats. Quantum chemistry calculations suggest that these beats result from coupling between the [Pt3(CO)6] layer motions and the electronic excitation. Theoretical model calculations for quantum beats at both electronic states are performed following the doorway-window approach. The calculations explain the oscillation frequency difference, the node positions, and the asymmetry. The beats with different frequencies result from vibronic coupling with different electronic states with the Herzberg-Teller (ground) or Franck-Condon term (excited) involved. The theoretical nodes occur at absorption and fluorescence centers, respectively, although experimental results show a slight blueshift. Quantum window operator calculations link the beat amplitude asymmetry to the Franck-Condon factor matrix imbalances, with the number of nodes dependent on the electronic dephasing rate. The theoretical insights for quantum beats are expected to be general, potentially helpful for the interpretation of observations in other systems.
Related Concept Videos
π Electron Effects on Chemical Shift: Overview
Atomic Nuclei: Larmor Precession Frequency
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

