Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
What Type of Self-Assessment Is Best for Your Educational Activity? A Review of Pre-Post, Now-Then, and Post-Only
James H Wykowski1, Helene Starks2
1Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA. james.wykowski@cuanschutz.edu.
Abstract:
In medical education, learner self-assessments are standard methods used to evaluate the impact of curricula and workshops. Due to the subjective nature of self-assessment, these measures are prone to known biases including framing, recall, social desirability, and response-shift bias. These biases can contribute to floor and ceiling effects of measurement, which can lead to false conclusions about whether the intended learning objectives were achieved. Ideal assessments of skills-based educational activities would include standardized tests and structured observations of learners demonstrating skill use before and after the educational intervention. However, educators often lack the necessary resources, time, and expertise to routinely conduct these appraisals and rely on self-assessment as a pragmatic approach to obtaining curriculum feedback and evaluation data. In this review, we describe three common designs for self-assessments: the pre-post, now-then, and post-only designs. We then give recommendations for choosing between each design to minimize bias. The choice of the best design is based on alignments with four considerations: (1) the educational objectives (e.g., demonstrate skill competency and/or change in skill level); (2) participants' prior experience and shared understanding of levels of skill performance; (3) the nature of the educational activity; and (4) available resources. For each design, we review strengths, weaknesses, and known biases and discuss examples to highlight trade-offs between options. We also discuss the use of control groups and follow-up surveys to measure retention over time as additional methods to address bias and related confounding. The guidance presented here is intended to raise educators' awareness of common pitfalls in self-assessment; minimize the impact of known biases when possible; provide evidence, examples, and rationales for optimal design choices; and increase the rigor of self-assessment evaluations.
More Related Videos
00:08A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
Published on: September 4, 2019
12:55Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Experimental Designs
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Group Design
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Metacognition
Self-Report Tests of Personality