Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Author Spotlight: Unraveling the Impact of Mechanical Ventilation on Diaphragm Function and Patient Outcomes
Published on: November 3, 2023
Poor Correlation between Diaphragm Ultrasound and Invasive Gold Standard Technique Derived Respiratory Muscle
Janina Friedrich1, Binaya Regmi1, Benedikt Jörn1
1Department of Pneumology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Introduction:
Individuals who survive acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) might experience diaphragm muscle weakness. Diaphragm ultrasound may be an easy-to-obtain bedside tool for determining diaphragm function. However, twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure (twPdi) following magnetic stimulation (MS) of the phrenic nerves is the gold standard for non-volitional assessment of diaphragm strength. This study investigated whether diaphragm thickening ratio (DTR) measured on diaphragm ultrasound reflects diaphragm strength as measured by twPdi following MS of the phrenic nerves or other (volitional) invasively obtained pressure values and could therefore be used to accurately diagnose diaphragm weakness.
Methods:
One year after discharge, 50 individuals (14 female, age 58 ± 12 years) who had been hospitalised and treated for moderate-severe COVID-19 underwent standard spirometry and diaphragm ultrasound. TwPdi following cervical MS of the phrenic nerve and volitional inspiratory manoeuvres (Sniff and Mueller manoeuvre) were measured using oesophageal and gastric balloon catheters after transnasal placement.
Results:
At follow-up, no clinically meaningful restrictive lung function impairment was evident on spirometry. On diaphragm ultrasound, diaphragm dysfunction, i.e., an impaired DTR was detected in 24% (12/50) of participants. An objective diagnosis of diaphragm dysfunction, defined as twPdi <16 cm H2O, was made in 60% (30/50) of participants. The measurement results of the two methods did not agree, given that there were many false-negative but also false-positive results, so diaphragm ultrasound diagnosed in parts other patients with diaphragm dysfunction than twPdi. Diaphragm ultrasound had a sensitivity of 26.67% and a specificity of 80.0% in the detection of diaphragm dysfunction (positive predictive value 66.67%, negative predictive value 42.10%).
Conclusion:
Diagnosis of diaphragm weakness in individuals who have recovered from COVID-19 cannot be made accurately on diaphragm ultrasound (via DTR) but requires twPdi as the gold standard for assessment of diaphragm strength.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
Respiratory System Abnormal Finding I: Inspection and Percussion
Inspection Findings
During an inspection, several findings may suggest the presence of respiratory distress or disease. Pursed-lip breathing, where exhalation is slowed by...
Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract III: Percussion
Percussion in Respiratory Assessment
Percussion evaluates underlying tissue composition with audible and tactile vibrations,...
Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract II: Inspection
Chest Configuration
The chest configuration...
Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
Respiratory System Abnormal Finding II: Palpation and Auscultation
Palpation Findings
During a respiratory assessment, palpation can reveal several vital abnormalities:

