Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
Which components of the global alignment proportionality score have the greatest impact on outcomes in adult spinal
Oluwatobi O Onafowokan1, Oscar Krol1, Virginie Lafage2
1Duke Spine Division, Departments of Neurological and Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Purpose:
To investigate the impact of the Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score components on patient outcomes in Adult Spine Deformity (ASD) surgery.
Methods:
Patients included underwent assessment via the GAP score and its individual components: pelvic version (GAP PV), lumbar lordosis (GAP LL), lumbar distribution index (GAP LDI) and spinopelvic component (GAP SP). Multivariable analyses assessed the association between alignment in these components and clinical outcomes in ASD patients.
Results:
762 ASD patients met inclusion criteria. Alignment in GAP SP independently predicted meeting MCID for SR-22S and ODI and was associated with a lower likelihood of developing mechanical complications. Patients aligned in GAP SP were less likely to develop proximal junctional kyphosis (OR 0.42, 0.26-0.73, p = 0.01) and PJF (OR 0.3, 0.13-0.74, p = 0.01). Proportioned alignment in GAP SP with disproportioned alignment in GAP LDI contributed to an increased risk of PJK and PJF (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.95-6.82, p = 0.045). There was no significant association of GAP SP proportionality and GAP RPV (OR 1.1, 0.86-2.15, p = 0.253) or GAP LL (OR 1.34, 0.78-4.23, p = 0.673) disproportionality with outcomes. Disproportioned alignment in GAP SP but proportioned alignment in both GAP LL and GAP LDI was associated with decreased likelihood of PJK (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39-0.94, p = 0.02) and PJF (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.19-0.67, p = 0.001).
Conclusion:
The spinopelvic component of the GAP score is the most significant independent predictor of clinical outcomes. Its interaction with the other components of the GAP score also aids assessment of the risk for mechanical complications.
More Related Videos
07:44Evaluation of Patients' Posture and Gait Profile After Lumbar Fusion Surgery by Video Rasterstereography and Treadmill Gait Analysis
Published on: March 23, 2019
08:38Three-dimensional Navigation-guided, Prone, Single-position, Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Technique
Published on: July 15, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Plastic Deformations of Members with a Single Plane of Symmetry
Deformation of Member under Multiple Loadings
In the case of a member with a variable cross-section, the strain is not constant but depends on the position. The deformation of an...