Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Applications of Epidermal Stem Cells

Clinical Applications of Epidermal Stem Cells

Epidermal stem cells (EpiSCs) are mainly located at the basal layer of the epidermis. These cells repair minor injuries of the skin and replace dead skin cells. However, EpiSCs’ cannot heal severe wounds such as major burns or those from diabetes or hereditary disorders. In such cases, culturing the epidermal stem cells from the patient is possible and has yielded successful treatment options, such as laboratory-grown skin grafts. These grafts are synthesized using a patient’s own...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A perioperative multi-modal fusion and deep learning-based prognostic system for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-institutional study.

Insights into imaging·2026

Same author

Skeletal and Peripheral Editing of Pyridinium Salts into Fully Substituted Pyrroles.

Organic letters·2026

Same author

Clinical efficacy of supine direct-superior approach versus posterolateral approach in hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients.

BMC musculoskeletal disorders·2026

Same author

In situ nanozyme assembly amplification enables sub-femtomolar-level colorimetric immunoassay.

Mikrochimica acta·2026

Same author

Combined Upadacitinib and Vedolizumab as 8-Week Induction Therapy for Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association·2026

Same author

Brain structure and function changes in Crohn's disease with or without depression based on multi-modal MRI.

Journal of affective disorders·2026

Same journal

Management of the Buccal Fat Pad During Deep-Plane Facelift: Technique, Safety, and Aesthetic Outcomes in 68 Patients.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026

Same journal

The First Nationwide Mapping of Aesthetic Treatments in Medicine in Central Europe: A Descriptive Observational Analysis.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026

Same journal

Integrated Surgical and Nonsurgical Approaches to Chin Augmentation: Our Clinical Algorithm and Technique.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026

Same journal

Prolene Suture Suspension Within a Multimodal Facial Rejuvenation Protocol: A 30-Year Experience.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026

Same journal

No-Vertical-Scar Reduction Mammaplasty in Asian Patients: A Comparison of Superior Versus Inferior Pedicle Techniques.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026

Same journal

Redefining Gynecomastia Surgery: Subtle Changes and Naturalistic Results.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2025

In vitro Synthesis of Native, Fibrous Long Spacing and Segmental Long Spacing Collagen

In vitro Synthesis of Native, Fibrous Long Spacing and Segmental Long Spacing Collagen

Published on: September 20, 2012

The Differences Between Sculptra and AestheFill Reconstitution Processes.

Jui-Yu Lin¹, Xiang Peng^2,3, Chuan-Yuan Lin⁴

¹Li-An Medical Clinic, 4F., No. 267, Lequn 2nd Rd., Zhongshan District, Taipei City, 104452, Taiwan.

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

|November 4, 2024

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study compares the reconstitution processes for Sculptra (poly-L-lactic acid) and AestheFill (poly-D,L-lactic acid) biostimulators. Understanding these differences is key for effective facial rejuvenation treatments.

Keywords:

AestheFill Agglomeration Carboxymethylcellulose Poly-D,L-lactic acid Poly-L-lactic acid Reconstitution Sculptra

More Related Videos

Engineering a Bilayered Hydrogel to Control ASC Differentiation

Engineering a Bilayered Hydrogel to Control ASC Differentiation

Published on: May 25, 2012

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Potential of Fat-Derived Stromal Vascular Fraction for Wound Healing

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Potential of Fat-Derived Stromal Vascular Fraction for Wound Healing

Published on: November 17, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2025

In vitro Synthesis of Native, Fibrous Long Spacing and Segmental Long Spacing Collagen

In vitro Synthesis of Native, Fibrous Long Spacing and Segmental Long Spacing Collagen

Published on: September 20, 2012

Engineering a Bilayered Hydrogel to Control ASC Differentiation

Engineering a Bilayered Hydrogel to Control ASC Differentiation

Published on: May 25, 2012

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Potential of Fat-Derived Stromal Vascular Fraction for Wound Healing

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Potential of Fat-Derived Stromal Vascular Fraction for Wound Healing

Published on: November 17, 2023

Area of Science:

Aesthetic Medicine
Dermatology
Biomaterials

Background:

Facial rejuvenation utilizes biostimulators like Sculptra (PLLA) and AestheFill (PDLLA).
Both are lyophilized powders requiring reconstitution with sterile water for injection.
Subtle variations exist in their preparation protocols.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the reconstitution procedures for Sculptra and AestheFill.
To highlight key differences in preparing these poly-lactic acid biostimulators.
To inform practitioners on optimal reconstitution techniques for facial rejuvenation.

Main Methods:

Comparative analysis of manufacturer guidelines for Sculptra and AestheFill.
Review of reconstitution steps, including water volume, mixing, and waiting times.
Focus on achieving homogeneous suspensions for injection.

Main Results:

Identified specific differences in recommended sterile water volumes for reconstitution.
Noted variations in required mixing techniques and post-reconstitution waiting periods.
Highlighted potential impacts of these procedural differences on final suspension homogeneity.

Conclusions:

Accurate reconstitution is crucial for the efficacy and safety of PLLA and PDLLA biostimulators.
Practitioners should adhere to specific protocols for Sculptra and AestheFill.
Further research may elucidate the clinical implications of observed reconstitution variations.