Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I01:21

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I

There are different types of detectors used in gas chromatography, each with its own specific properties that make it suitable for detecting certain types of analytes. The most commonly used detectors in GC are thermal conductivity detector (TCD), flame ionization detector (FID), and electron capture detector (ECD).
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Endogenous-metabolite-inspired polyamine-oleic acid lipids for safe mRNA delivery and PCSK9 gene editing.

Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society·2026
Same author

A multiple-encrypted DNA device for secure communication.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Mitigating Electrode Stress via Self-Constructed Interfacial Carrier Networks in High-Areal-Capacity SiO<sub><i>x</i></sub> Anodes.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

Amphibian-inspired neuromorphic dynamic vision systems based on ferroelectric field-effect transistor.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Steady, Flexible Memristor with Lead-Free Perovskite for Bionic Perception.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2026
Same author

Polyhydroxybutyrate production-oriented wastewater valorization: Aniline as a selective stress enabling non-sterile operation.

Water research·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 23, 2026

Identification of Olfactory Volatiles using Gas Chromatography-Multi-unit Recordings GCMR in the Insect Antennal Lobe
09:49

Identification of Olfactory Volatiles using Gas Chromatography-Multi-unit Recordings GCMR in the Insect Antennal Lobe

Published on: February 24, 2013

14.3K

MXene/WO3 Sensor Array with Improved SNN Algorithm for Accurate Identification of Toxic Gases.

Liangchao Guo1, Junke Wang1, Haoran Han1

  • 1College of Mechanical Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, PR China.

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
|November 5, 2024
PubMed
Summary

This study developed advanced MXene-based gas sensors for detecting toxic gases. An improved spiking neural network (SNN) achieved 95.83% accuracy in identifying four gases, showing great potential for safety applications.

Keywords:
Artificial synapsesElectronic nose systemsMachine learningSpiking neural networkV2CTx/WO3

More Related Videos

Aerosol-assisted Chemical Vapor Deposition of Metal Oxide Structures: Zinc Oxide Rods
06:39

Aerosol-assisted Chemical Vapor Deposition of Metal Oxide Structures: Zinc Oxide Rods

Published on: September 14, 2017

13.1K
Real-time Breath Analysis by Using Secondary Nanoelectrospray Ionization Coupled to High Resolution Mass Spectrometry
08:23

Real-time Breath Analysis by Using Secondary Nanoelectrospray Ionization Coupled to High Resolution Mass Spectrometry

Published on: March 9, 2018

8.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 23, 2026

Identification of Olfactory Volatiles using Gas Chromatography-Multi-unit Recordings GCMR in the Insect Antennal Lobe
09:49

Identification of Olfactory Volatiles using Gas Chromatography-Multi-unit Recordings GCMR in the Insect Antennal Lobe

Published on: February 24, 2013

14.3K
Aerosol-assisted Chemical Vapor Deposition of Metal Oxide Structures: Zinc Oxide Rods
06:39

Aerosol-assisted Chemical Vapor Deposition of Metal Oxide Structures: Zinc Oxide Rods

Published on: September 14, 2017

13.1K
Real-time Breath Analysis by Using Secondary Nanoelectrospray Ionization Coupled to High Resolution Mass Spectrometry
08:23

Real-time Breath Analysis by Using Secondary Nanoelectrospray Ionization Coupled to High Resolution Mass Spectrometry

Published on: March 9, 2018

8.9K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Chemical Sensing
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Gas sensing is crucial for industrial production and food safety.
  • MXene materials offer promising properties for gas sensor development.
  • Accurate identification of toxic gases remains a challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the gas classification capabilities of MXene-based gas sensors.
  • To investigate the effect of WO3 nanoparticles on sensor performance.
  • To develop an accurate method for toxic gas identification using a spiking neural network (SNN).

Main Methods:

  • Synthesis of pure V2CTx MXene and MXene/WO3 nanocomposite.
  • Fabrication of a 2x2 MXene-based gas sensor array.
  • Integration with a memristive system-based SNN for gas classification.
  • Gas sensitivity and stability testing at room temperature.

Main Results:

  • MXene/WO3 nanocomposite enhanced NO2 sensor response.
  • Rapid response/recovery times (74.5/149.0 s) and excellent stability were observed.
  • The SNN-based method achieved 95.83% accuracy in identifying four toxic gases.
  • The SNN demonstrated a 5% higher accuracy compared to other algorithms.

Conclusions:

  • MXene-based gas sensors, particularly with WO3, show high potential for gas detection.
  • The SNN offers a powerful and accurate approach for toxic gas identification.
  • This technology can significantly enhance industrial safety and environmental monitoring.