Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

155
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
155
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

148
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
148
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

1.6K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
1.6K
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

5.7K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
5.7K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.2K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.2K
Cross-Sectional Research01:50

Cross-Sectional Research

11.2K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Estimating probabilities of malaria importation in southern Mozambique through modelling <i>P. falciparum</i> genomics and mobility patterns.

eLife·2026
Same author

Effects of malaria intermittent preventive treatment with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine on antiretroviral drug concentrations in African pregnant women living with HIV.

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy·2026
Same author

Longitudinal spatial neutrophil profiling during ACT in murine melanoma reveals distinct lymph node infiltration patterns.

NPJ systems biology and applications·2026
Same author

The road map for ISO 15189-laboratory accreditation: The Experience of Manhiça Health Research Centre (CISM) laboratory, in southern Mozambique.

African journal of laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

Health-related Quality of Life in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B and Liver-Related Complications in The Gambia.

Value in health regional issues·2026
Same author

Data-driven model reveals increased stability of CAG-expanded huntingtin RNA due to MID1 binding.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Topological skeleton analysis for network-based shape representation in biology and beyond.

iScience·2026
Same journal

Condition-specific neural signatures of reactivation during post-retrieval rest: An EEG study.

iScience·2026
Same journal

Multi-chaotic signal identification employing a causal cross-correlation neural network.

iScience·2026
Same journal

Repeated insertions at positions 261-280 in KPC-2 highlight a ceftazidime-avibactam resistance hotspot.

iScience·2026
Same journal

ROS inhibits microtubule dynamics and cell growth heterogeneity during Arabidopsis sepal morphogenesis.

iScience·2026
Same journal

Type 1 diabetes alters early macrophage-<i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> transcriptional coordination during infection.

iScience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Author Spotlight: Alignment of Synchronized Time-Series Data Using the Characterizing Loss of Cell Cycle Synchrony Model for Cross-Experiment Comparisons
07:59

Author Spotlight: Alignment of Synchronized Time-Series Data Using the Characterizing Loss of Cell Cycle Synchrony Model for Cross-Experiment Comparisons

Published on: June 9, 2023

1.3K

Federated difference-in-differences with multiple time periods in DataSHIELD.

Manuel Huth1,2, Carolina Alvarez Garavito2, Lea Seep2

  • 1Institute for Computational Biology, Helmholtz Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich, Germany.

Iscience
|November 5, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Federated learning enables robust causal impact evaluations using difference-in-differences (DID) on sensitive data. This privacy-preserving approach enhances statistical power and expands the scope of policy and treatment effect analyses.

Keywords:
Computer scienceHealth informaticsMachine learning

More Related Videos

Construction of a Compact Low-Cost Radiation Shield for Air-Temperature Sensors in Ecological Field Studies
05:56

Construction of a Compact Low-Cost Radiation Shield for Air-Temperature Sensors in Ecological Field Studies

Published on: November 6, 2018

8.1K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Author Spotlight: Alignment of Synchronized Time-Series Data Using the Characterizing Loss of Cell Cycle Synchrony Model for Cross-Experiment Comparisons
07:59

Author Spotlight: Alignment of Synchronized Time-Series Data Using the Characterizing Loss of Cell Cycle Synchrony Model for Cross-Experiment Comparisons

Published on: June 9, 2023

1.3K
Construction of a Compact Low-Cost Radiation Shield for Air-Temperature Sensors in Ecological Field Studies
05:56

Construction of a Compact Low-Cost Radiation Shield for Air-Temperature Sensors in Ecological Field Studies

Published on: November 6, 2018

8.1K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K

Area of Science:

  • Econometrics
  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Difference-in-differences (DID) is crucial for causal inference but hindered by privacy regulations in sensitive data analysis.
  • Current methods face challenges with reduced sample sizes and statistical power due to consent requirements.
  • Existing federated DID software is limited, restricting its application in privacy-sensitive research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a federated version of the Callaway and Sant'Anna difference-in-differences (CSDID) method.
  • To integrate the federated CSDID approach into the DataSHIELD platform for secure, privacy-preserving analysis.
  • To demonstrate the utility of federated DID for causal impact evaluation with sensitive, multi-site data.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a federated CSDID algorithm compatible with DataSHIELD's privacy framework.
  • Utilizing aggregated statistics instead of raw individual data for privacy preservation.
  • Validation using simulated datasets and real-world data from a malaria intervention study in Mozambique.

Main Results:

  • The federated CSDID approach successfully reproduced key estimates and standard errors from traditional DID analyses.
  • Federated analysis demonstrated increased sample sizes and reduced estimation uncertainty compared to non-federated approaches.
  • The method enabled causal impact evaluations even when direct sharing of treated or untreated group data was not feasible.

Conclusions:

  • Federated learning offers a viable solution for conducting rigorous DID analyses on sensitive data, overcoming privacy barriers.
  • The developed federated CSDID method enhances statistical power and analytical capabilities in multi-center or cross-border research.
  • This approach facilitates broader and more effective evaluation of policy interventions and treatments globally.