Proposing new lipoprotein (a) cut off value for Kazakhstan: pilot study

Makhabbat Bekbossynova1, Marat Aripov2, Tatyana Ivanova-Razumova3

  • 1Heart Center, "University Medical Center" Corporate Fund, Astana, Kazakhstan.

PubMed

Insights

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. This study found a lower Lp(a) threshold of 21.1 mg/dL for Kazakhstani populations, suggesting current guidelines may not apply to Central Asians.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Genetics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a recognized risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) and aortic valve stenosis.
  • Current clinical guidelines suggest threshold levels for Lp(a) at 30 mg/dL or 50 mg/dL, but consensus is lacking.
  • Optimal Lp(a) thresholds may vary across different ethnic populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To estimate the specific cut-off value of Lp(a) associated with ASCVD risk in the Central Asian, specifically Kazakhstani, population.
  • To investigate the relationship between Lp(a) levels and other cardiovascular risk factors in this population.
  • To determine if existing international Lp(a) thresholds are applicable to Kazakhstani individuals.

Main Methods:

  • A study involving 487 patients from the National Research Cardiac Surgery Center in Kazakhstan.
  • Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were employed to assess risk factors and Lp(a) levels.
  • The Youden index was utilized to predict the threshold value of Lp(a).

Main Results:

  • The identified Lp(a) cut-off value for atherosclerotic CVD and aortic valve calcification risk in the Kazakhstani population was 21.1 mg/dL (p < 0.05).
  • No significant relationship was observed between Lp(a) levels and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C).
  • This suggests Lp(a) acts as an independent risk factor for ASCVD in this cohort.

Conclusions:

  • The study establishes a novel, lower Lp(a) threshold (21.2 mg/dL) for cardiovascular risk in the Kazakhstani population.
  • These findings indicate that international Lp(a) cutoffs may not be universally applicable to Central Asian populations.
  • Further research with larger sample sizes is recommended to validate and refine region-specific Lp(a) thresholds.
Abstract