Right ventricular outlet tract reconstruction for tetralogy of Fallot: systematic review and network meta-analysis

Concerns persist regarding pulmonary regurgitation after transannular patch repair (TAP) for tetralogy of Fallot. Despite the introduction of various architectural preservation techniques, the optimal strategy remains controversial. Our goal was to compare different right ventricular outlet tract reconstruction techniques.

PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central were searched through March 2024 to identify comparative studies on right ventricular outlet tract reconstruction techniques (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024519404). The primary outcome was mid-term pulmonary regurgitation, with secondary outcomes including postoperative mortality, postoperative pulmonary regurgitation, length of intensive care unit stays, postoperative right ventricular outlet tract pressure gradient and mid-term mortality. We performed a network meta-analysis to compare outcomes among TAP, valve-repairing (VR), TAP with neo-valve creation (TAPN) and valve-sparing (VS).

Two randomized controlled studies and 32 observational studies were identified with 8890 patients. TAP carried a higher risk of mid-term pulmonary regurgitation compared to TAPN [hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.33; 0.85)] and VS [hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% CI (0.19; 0.39)], with no significant difference compared to VR. VS was also associated with reduced postoperative mortality compared to TAP [risk ratio, 0.31; 95% CI (0.18; 0.56)], in addition to reduced ventilation time. TAP also carried an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary regurgitation compared to the other groups. The groups were comparable in terms of length of intensive care unit stay, right ventricular outlet tract pressure gradient and mid-term mortality.

VR was associated with a reduced risk of postoperative pulmonary regurgitation, whereas TAPN was associated with reduced risks of both postoperative and mid-term pulmonary regurgitation.