Longitudinal studies in clinical psychoendocrinology: methodology

There are five universal exigencies of being human, against which a person's existence can be evaluated: pairbondage, troopbondage, abidance, ycleptance, and foredoomance. They constitute a template from which a standardized agenda or schedule of inquiry is generated, as needed, for a particular research investigation. The schedule of inquiry is painstakingly designed ahead of time so as to ensure coverage of all the variables relevant to a particular study. For economy of expense and effort, subjects conclude their own prior interviews by summarizing it on tape, with the interviewer making a written record, verbatim, of what will become subheadings in the transcript. Inquiry progresses from an open-ended to a forced choice interrogatory. Topics in the public domain open the way to inquiry on personally sensitive issues. So also do parables drawn from actual cases and used as personalized narrative projective tests. A cumulative record, covering as many as 25 years, is indexed so that relevant material can be located, abstracted, and classified for any particular study. A jury of two or more then uses the abstracted data to fill out a prepared data schedule, using its own standardized scoring or rating criteria. By contrast, an ordinary questionnaire uses standardized questions, and each subject applies his or her own unstandardized scoring or rating criteria in answering them. In the final step, the jury's ratings are tabulated on a master chart that consolidates the scores of a group of subjects and controls, ready for statistical analysis.