Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

121
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
121
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

91
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
91
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

83
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
83
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

118
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
118
Hazard Rate01:11

Hazard Rate

90
The hazard rate, also known as the hazard function or failure rate, is a statistical measure used to describe the instantaneous rate at which an event occurs, given that the event has not yet happened. From a probabilistic perspective, it represents the likelihood that a subject will experience the event in a very small time interval, conditional on surviving up to the beginning of that interval. In terms of frequency, the hazard rate can be viewed as the ratio of the number of events to the...
90
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention01:26

Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention

12.5K
Health promotion allows a person to control the determinants of health, resulting in an improved health status. It enhances the quality of life and reduces premature deaths. Health promotion and illness prevention programs help people make beneficial choices to reduce the risk of disease and disabilities. There are three health promotion and illness prevention levels: primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention.
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
12.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Health worker practices and challenges surrounding routine immunisation service delivery of measles-containing vaccine: a cross-sectional assessment of health facilities in Oromia region, Ethiopia - 2021.

BMJ public health·2026
Same author

Comparative Accuracy of TCD, TTE, TEE, and Cardiac CT in Detecting Right-to-Left Shunt in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source.

Neurology. Clinical practice·2026
Same author

Brain-engrafted monocyte-derived macrophages from blood and skull-bone marrow exhibit distinct properties.

Neuron·2026
Same author

Targeting amyloid-β pathology by chimeric antigen receptor astrocyte (CAR-A) therapy.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

PFO-ACCESS: Augmenting Communications for Medical Care or Closure in the Evaluation of Patients With Stroke With Cardiac Shunts.

Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)·2026
Same author

Comparison of Six Data Cleaning Methods for Determining Repetitive Head Impact Exposure in Youth Tackle Football.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.0K

Optimizing Hierarchical Condition Category-Risk Adjustment Factor Management in Population Health Using Rapid Process

Karri L Benjamin1, Brett C Meyer1, Jeff Pan1

  • 1University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.

Population Health Management
|November 6, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) reimbursement relies on Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) coding. This study used Lean methodology to develop tools, improving HCC-Risk Adjustment Factor (RAF) management and achieving a 4.1% score increase.

Keywords:
HCCLeanRAFbillingcodinghierarchicalrisk adjustment factortransformation

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.0K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.4K

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Quality Improvement
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) reimbursement is tied to Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) coding.
  • Risk adjustment optimization in medical systems often involves expensive chart review processes.
  • Previous workflow implementations for HCC management were complex and siloed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To implement HCC-Risk Adjustment Factor (RAF) improvement tools for optimized HCC-RAF management in Population Health.
  • To utilize rapid process improvement methods to streamline HCC coding and documentation.
  • To reduce costs associated with traditional chart review processes.

Main Methods:

  • Employed Lean methodology and Rapid Process Improvement Workshops (RPIW) to develop and implement tools.
  • Created a suite of tools including provider education, tip sheets, clinical champions, audits, practice alerts, and decision-support tools.
  • Embedded new tools into standard work for provider teams.

Main Results:

  • Achieved a 4.1% improvement in enterprise HCC-RAF scores in Year 1.
  • Developed optimized workflows and tools for providers and team members.
  • Demonstrated provider willingness to adopt new tools, indicating successful culture change.

Conclusions:

  • Lean improvement methods facilitated the collective design and adoption of HCC management tools.
  • Streamlined processes and newly developed tools optimized operations and reduced waste.
  • Providers embraced the tools, enabling them to work more efficiently and effectively.