Evaluation and Comparison of Tolerance of Ambiguity in Veterinary Pathology Professionals and Trainees

Ambiguity is ubiquitous in veterinary medicine, including in clinical and anatomic pathology. Tolerance of ambiguity (TOA) relates to how individuals navigate uncertainty. It is associated with psychological well-being in health professionals yet has been little investigated in veterinarians or veterinary pathologists. In this study, we used the Tolerance of Ambiguity of Veterinary Students (TAVS) scale and eight previously evaluated items specific to clinical pathology to evaluate and compare TOA in pathology professionals and trainees. We hypothesized that scores would be higher (reflecting greater TOA) for professionals than for trainees, that scores would increase with years of diagnostic experience for professionals and year of study for trainees, and that scores would be higher for clinical than anatomic pathologists due to the frequent ambiguity of clinical pathology practice. One hundred eighty one pathology professionals and trainees participated. TAVS scores were significantly higher for professionals than for trainees, and scores increased significantly with year of experience for professionals but not with year of study for trainees. When comparing disciplines, TAVS scores for all clinical pathologists were significantly lower than scores for all anatomic pathologists. Scores for clinical pathology-specific items showed similar trends to TAVS scores, except when comparing disciplines (clinical pathologists tended to have higher scores for these items). Results suggest pathology professionals become more tolerant of ambiguity throughout their careers, independent of increasing TOA with age, and that navigating ambiguity might be more difficult for trainees than for professionals. Educational interventions might help trainees learn to successfully navigate ambiguity, which could impact psychological well-being.