Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Proofreading and DNA Repair Assay Using Single Nucleotide Extension and MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Analysis
Published on: June 19, 2018
Comparing Shor and Steane error correction using the Bacon-Shor code
Shilin Huang1,2, Kenneth R Brown1,2,3,4, Marko Cetina1,2,3
1Duke Quantum Center, Duke University, Durham, NC 27701, USA.
Abstract:
Quantum states decohere through interaction with the environment. Quantum error correction can preserve coherence through active feedback wherein quantum information is encoded into a logical state with a high degree of symmetry. Perturbations are detected by measuring the symmetries of the state and corrected by applying gates based on these measurements. To measure the symmetries without perturbing the data, ancillary quantum states are required. Shor error correction uses a separate quantum state for the measurement of each symmetry. Steane error correction maps the perturbations onto a logical ancilla qubit, which is then measured to check several symmetries simultaneously. We experimentally compare Shor and Steane correction of bit flip errors using the Bacon-Shor code implemented in a chain of 23 trapped atomic ions. We find that the Steane method produces fewer errors after a single round of error correction and less disturbance to the data qubits without error correction.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Improving Translational Accuracy
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

