On the falsifiability of matching theory

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 15, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

J J McDowell

    Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
    |January 1, 1986
    PubMed

    More Related Videos

    An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime07:36

    An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

    Published on: May 3, 2016

    A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments08:12

    A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

    Published on: March 1, 2022

    Related Concept Videos

    The Scientific Method02:40

    The Scientific Method

    Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
    Relationship Formation02:12

    Relationship Formation

    What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
    Null and Alternative Hypotheses01:16

    Null and Alternative Hypotheses

    The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed  the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
    The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As  a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
    The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the population that is...
    Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?01:17

    Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

    The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
    There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null hypothesis and 'fail to...
    Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

    Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

    Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
    Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

    Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

    Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus: Comparing...