Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hardy-Weinberg Principle01:49

Hardy-Weinberg Principle

71.8K
Diploid organisms have two alleles of each gene, one from each parent, in their somatic cells. Therefore, each individual contributes two alleles to the gene pool of the population. The gene pool of a population is the sum of every allele of all genes within that population and has some degree of variation. Genetic variation is typically expressed as a relative frequency, which is the percentage of the total population that has a given allele, genotype or phenotype.
71.8K
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift01:09

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

58.1K
In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
58.1K
Genetic Drift03:33

Genetic Drift

39.5K
Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.
39.5K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

29
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
29
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

97
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
97
Speciation Rates01:07

Speciation Rates

21.1K
Overview
21.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bayesian Credible Sets for Phylogenetic Tree Topologies with Applications to Coverage Analysis and Cross-Model Comparison.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same author

Navigating the mysterious space of evolutionary histories.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Regenerative base editing enables deep lineage recording.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Biological causes and impacts of rugged tree landscapes in phylodynamic inference.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Three evolutionary radiations shaped the evolution of global religious diversity.

Evolutionary human sciences·2025
Same author

Evidence of latency reshapes our understanding of Ebola virus reservoir dynamics.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same journal

Diversification dynamics in the global radiation of gobies.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Correction to: nQMaker: Estimating Time Nonreversible Amino Acid Substitution Models.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Phylogenomic challenges in polyploid-rich lineages: Insights from paralog processing and reticulation methods using the complex genus Packera (Asteraceae: Senecioneae).

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

An evolving view of phylogenetic biogeography.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Modeling Site-and-Branch-Heterogeneity with GFmix.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Coalescent-based branch length estimation improves dating of species trees.

Systematic biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

920

How to Validate a Bayesian Evolutionary Model.

Fábio K Mendes1, Remco Bouckaert2, Luiz M Carvalho3

  • 1Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.

Systematic Biology
|November 7, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces best practices for validating computational biology software, focusing on Bayesian methods. It also presents tools to automate these validation protocols for more reliable biological research.

Keywords:
Bayesian modelProbabilistic modelcoveragemodel validation

More Related Videos

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin
08:57

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Published on: August 14, 2018

15.8K
A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

35.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

920
Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin
08:57

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Published on: August 14, 2018

15.8K
A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

35.3K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Biostatistics
  • Mathematical Biology

Background:

  • Biology increasingly relies on mathematical and probabilistic models.
  • Complex computational tools are essential for modern biological research.
  • Lack of standardized validation practices for biological software hinders reproducibility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish and promote good practices for validating computational biology software.
  • To address the variability in current software validation methods.
  • To advance the literature on statistical software validation in biology.

Main Methods:

  • Describing and illustrating new validation practices for model implementation.
  • Focusing on validation techniques for Bayesian methods.
  • Introducing functionalities for automating validation protocols.

Main Results:

  • A framework for assessing the correctness of model implementations.
  • Guidelines for validating statistical software in computational biology.
  • Automated tools to streamline the validation process.

Conclusions:

  • Improved validation practices are crucial for the reliability of computational biology tools.
  • Standardized validation elevates the expected quality of biological software.
  • The proposed guidelines and tools aim to enhance research rigor.