Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
Published on: June 20, 2018
A Systematic Review and Comparative Analysis of Reconstructive Rhytidectomy: Advantages, Disadvantages, and Patient
Christopher R Meretsky1, Paulette Hausner2, Brian P Flynn3
1Surgery, St. George's University School of Medicine, Great River, USA.
Abstract:
Reconstructive rhytidectomy, commonly known as facelift surgery, is a prominent cosmetic procedure aimed at rejuvenating facial appearance by addressing signs of aging. This paper critically evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of various surgical techniques involved in rhytidectomy, including the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS), deep plane facelift, and subperiosteal approaches. This systematic review of recent literature highlights key outcomes such as scar quality, postoperative pain management, and patient satisfaction. While the techniques demonstrate significant improvements in aesthetic results and patient quality of life, they also present risks including complications, dissatisfaction with outcomes, and the financial burden of surgery. Future directions indicate a trend toward minimally invasive approaches, integration of regenerative medicine, and personalized surgical planning, aiming to optimize results and minimize risks.
More Related Videos
10:42A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
13:35Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
Published on: May 17, 2024