Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2025

An Integrated Workflow of Identification and Quantification on FDR Control-Based Untargeted Metabolome
Published on: September 20, 2022
Directional false discovery rate control in large-scale multiple comparisons
Wenjuan Liang1,2, Dongdong Xiang1, Yajun Mei3
1KLATASDS-MOE, School of Statistics, East China Normal University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
This study introduces a new statistical method for identifying under-expressed and over-expressed genes. The procedure effectively controls false discoveries in both directions, improving gene expression analysis.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Genomics
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- High-throughput technology generates massive gene expression data.
- Identifying differentially expressed genes (under- and over-expressed) is crucial for disease research.
- Existing methods often fail to control false discoveries separately for under- and over-expressed genes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a novel statistical procedure for multiple testing in gene expression analysis.
- To separately control false discovery rates for under-expressed and over-expressed genes.
- To maximize true discoveries while maintaining control over false positives in both directions.
Main Methods:
- A three-classification multiple testing framework was employed.
- A practical, data-driven procedure was developed.
- The procedure was designed to control false discovery rates for under- and over-expressed genes distinctly.
Main Results:
- The proposed procedure is theoretically valid and optimal.
- It maximizes the expected number of true discoveries.
- It simultaneously controls false discovery rates for both under-expressed and over-expressed genes with flexibility in nominal levels.
- Effectiveness demonstrated on two large-scale genomic datasets.
Conclusions:
- The developed procedure offers an effective solution for identifying directional gene expression changes.
- It provides superior control over false discoveries compared to existing methods.
- The flexibility and optimality make it a valuable tool for genomic data analysis.
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Bonferroni Test
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

