Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

176
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
176
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

4.2K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
4.2K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

1.5K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
1.5K
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

2.5K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n)  to the number of categories (k).
2.5K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.4K
Determination of Expected Frequency01:08

Determination of Expected Frequency

2.1K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
2.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Variable selection for clinical prediction models in low-dimensional data - a simulation study comparing traditional regression and machine learning methods.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same author

Primary versus secondary microvascular bony jaw reconstruction in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma and adjuvant therapy - a retrospective cohort study.

Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery·2026
Same author

Estimation, testing and sample size calculation within the responder-stratified exponential survival model.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same author

Parental mental illness and child brain structure: A diffusion MRI study of emotion regulation related pathways.

NeuroImage·2026
Same author

Multimodal assessment of emotion regulation in children of parents with a mental illness.

European child & adolescent psychiatry·2026
Same author

Association of hemodynamic variability during endovascular stroke treatment with functional outcome and parenchymal hemorrhage.

Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.6K

New results on optimal conditional error functions for adaptive two-stage designs.

Maximilian Pilz1,2, Meinhard Kieser1

  • 1Institute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Journal of Applied Statistics
|November 7, 2024
PubMed
Summary

This study explores optimal conditional error functions for adaptive clinical trials. It shows how variational calculus can derive these functions and optimizes them for promising zone designs, improving trial efficiency.

Keywords:
Adaptive designclinical trialconditional error functionoptimal designvariational calculus

More Related Videos

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
20:24

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

16.5K
A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
08:05

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

9.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.6K
Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
20:24

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

16.5K
A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
08:05

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

9.7K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Statistical Methods

Background:

  • Unblinded interim analyses in adaptive clinical trials are increasingly common.
  • Controlling the type I error rate is crucial in these trials, often achieved using conditional error functions.
  • The selection of an optimal conditional error function remains an open question.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To extend existing work on optimal conditional error functions.
  • To demonstrate the application of variational calculus in deriving optimal conditional error functions.
  • To optimize the conditional error function for promising zone designs and assess efficiency gains.

Main Methods:

  • Application of variational calculus techniques.
  • Derivation of existing optimal conditional error functions.
  • Optimization of conditional error functions for promising zone designs.

Main Results:

  • Variational calculus can be effectively used to derive optimal conditional error functions.
  • An optimal conditional error function for promising zone designs was identified.
  • Investigation into the efficiency gains associated with the optimized function.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides a mathematical framework for deriving and optimizing conditional error functions.
  • The findings contribute to more efficient and robust adaptive clinical trial designs.
  • Optimized conditional error functions enhance the control of type I error rates in clinical research.