Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Transoral Robotic Total Thyroidectomy and Bilateral Central Regional Lymph Node Dissection for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
Published on: September 15, 2023
Adhesion Reduction Agent Guardix-SG® Versus MegaShield® for Postoperative Swallowing Function Analysis in
Hye Kyoung Lee1,2, Jihye Hwang1,2, Seongmoon Jo1,3
1Department and Research Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
MegaShield® and Guardix-SG® are effective antiadhesion agents for post-thyroidectomy care, helping to prevent scar formation and improve swallowing function. Studies show MegaShield® is non-inferior to Guardix-SG® in reducing adhesion and improving patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Surgical innovation
- Medical device technology
- Postoperative care optimization
Background:
- Antiadhesion products are crucial for thyroidectomy patients, forming a barrier to prevent tissue adhesion.
- Thyroidectomy can cause swallowing difficulties due to tissue damage; antiadhesion agents may mitigate this.
- MegaShield® and Guardix-SG® are examples of antiadhesion agents used to reduce scar formation and improve swallowing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of MegaShield® versus Guardix-SG® as antiadhesion agents in post-thyroidectomy patients.
- To evaluate the impact of these agents on swallowing function and scar formation.
- To establish the noninferiority of MegaShield® to Guardix-SG®.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving patients undergoing thyroidectomy between October 2018 and March 2020.
- Patients were allocated 1:1 to receive either standard care with Guardix-SG® or MegaShield®.
- Swallowing function was assessed using Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS), NIH-Swallow Safety Scale (NIH-SSS), VDS, and DIGEST via Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study (VFSS).
Main Results:
- No statistically significant difference (P > .05) was found between MegaShield® and Guardix-SG® for PAS and NIH-SSS across different food consistencies.
- Several statistically significant differences were observed when comparing MegaShield®, Guardix-SG®, and a nonadhesion-reducing agent control group across various swallowing assessment criteria.
- The study demonstrated specific improvements in swallowing function metrics for patients receiving antiadhesion agents.
Conclusions:
- MegaShield® is proven to be non-inferior to Guardix-SG® as an antiadhesion agent in the context of post-thyroidectomy care.
- Both agents contribute to reducing scar formation and potentially improving postoperative swallowing function.
- The findings support the use of MegaShield® as a viable alternative to Guardix-SG® for enhancing patient recovery after thyroidectomy.
Related Concept Videos
Tonsillitis II: Management
Upper GI Series: Barium Swallow
Purpose and Procedure
Patients undergoing this procedure ingest a liquid containing barium sulfate with a chalky...
Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Sucralfate as Mucosal Protective Agents
In this scenario, mucosal protective agents like sucralfate play an essential role. Sucralfate, a complex of sulfated sucrose and aluminum hydroxide, demonstrates its usefulness in acidic conditions,...

