Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Pelvic Prolapse Treatment with a Non-Mesh Approach using Laparoscopic Pectopexy
Published on: October 25, 2024
Retraction: Five-year Follow-up of Two Types of Contraceptive Device Fitted During Elective Cesarean Delivery
M. S. E. Elsedeek, "Five-year Follow-up of Two Types of Contraceptive Device Fitted During Elective Cesarean Delivery," International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetric 130, no. 2 (2015): 179-182, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.02.031. The above article, published online on 29 April 2015 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor-in-Chief, Michael Geary; the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The retraction has been agreed following an investigation based on concerns raised by a third party. The editors found that numerous results are inconsistent with the summary data reported in the paper. The author was invited to comment on the concerns and provide supporting data but did not respond. The editors consider the results and conclusion reported in this article unreliable.
M. S. E. Elsedeek, "Five-year Follow-up of Two Types of Contraceptive Device Fitted During Elective Cesarean Delivery," International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetric 130, no. 2 (2015): 179-182, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.02.031. The above article, published online on 29 April 2015 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor-in-Chief, Michael Geary; the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The retraction has been agreed following an investigation based on concerns raised by a third party. The editors found that numerous results are inconsistent with the summary data reported in the paper. The author was invited to comment on the concerns and provide supporting data but did not respond. The editors consider the results and conclusion reported in this article unreliable.

