Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
Published on: June 26, 2013
Neuroimaging-based variability in subtyping biomarkers for psychiatric heterogeneity
Zhenfu Wen1,2, Mira Z Hammoud1,2, Carole E Siegel1
1Department of Psychiatry, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Neuroimaging subtypes for psychiatric disorders show high internal validity but lack clinical differences. The choice of imaging technique significantly impacts subtype identification, challenging clinical utility and replication.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Psychiatry
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Neuroimaging-based subtyping aims to address heterogeneity in psychiatric disorders.
- The clinical utility and replicability of these neuro-subtypes remain uncertain.
- Previous research has not fully explored how different neuroimaging modalities affect subtyping outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how the selection of neuroimaging measures influences the derivation of neuro-subtypes in psychiatric populations.
- To assess the clinical and cognitive differences between neuro-subtypes identified using various neuroimaging techniques.
- To evaluate the concordance of neuro-subtyping solutions across different modalities and datasets.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of a heterogeneous psychiatric dataset (n=566) including controls, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), traumatic brain injury (TBI), and PTSD&TBI cases.
- Identification of neuro-subtypes using structural, resting-state, and task-based neuroimaging measures.
- Replication of findings in an independent dataset (n=1642) of major depressive disorder (MDD) and controls.
Main Results:
- Neuro-subtypes derived from each imaging modality exhibited high internal validity.
- No significant differences in clinical or cognitive profiles were observed between the identified neuro-subtypes.
- Substantial impact of neuroimaging measure choice on neuro-subtype identification, resulting in low cross-modality concordance.
- Similar variability in neuro-subtyping was confirmed in the independent MDD dataset.
Conclusions:
- The choice of neuroimaging modality significantly influences neuro-subtype identification in psychiatric disorders.
- Current neuroimaging-based subtyping methods may not reliably delineate clinically meaningful patient groups.
- The anticipated strong relationships between neuro-subtypes and clinical features are challenging to establish, questioning the clinical utility of current approaches.
More Related Videos
05:14Standardized Data Acquisition for Neuromelanin-Sensitive Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Substantia Nigra
Published on: September 8, 2021
13:08Measurement of Fronto-limbic Activity Using an Emotional Oddball Task in Children with Familial High Risk for Schizophrenia
Published on: December 2, 2015