Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2026

Development of a Quantitative Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Assay with an Internal Positive Control
Published on: March 30, 2015
Performance Characteristics of a Calculated Index Control Method for the phi Multianalyte Assay with Algorithmic
Radwa Ewaisha1,2, Tifani L Flieth1, Karl M Ness1
1Division of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Quality control for the Prostate Health Index (phi) needs improvement. A new calculated phi QC metric (PHIc) better monitors assay precision and bias, enhancing disease risk score reliability.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Biomedical Diagnostics
- Prostate Cancer Biomarkers
Background:
- Multianalyte assays with algorithmic analysis (MAAAs) like the Prostate Health Index (phi) are vital for disease risk scoring.
- Current quality control (QC) for phi assesses individual components, potentially missing overall index imprecision and bias.
- This indirect QC may not adequately ensure the reliability of the calculated multicomponent phi value.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the precision and bias of the Prostate Health Index (phi) compared to its individual components.
- To introduce and assess a novel calculated phi QC metric (PHIc) for improved monitoring of MAAA performance.
- To determine the frequency of QC failures for PHIc versus individual components using Westgard rules.
Main Methods:
- Compared inter- and intra-assay phi precision against individual component assay precision.
- Developed a calculated phi QC metric (PHIc) using QC data from total PSA, free PSA, and p2PSA.
- Analyzed PHIc QC failure rates against individual component QC failures (Westgard 13S, 22S) and examined bias effects on PHIc.
Main Results:
- Average measured phi imprecision (6.7% CV) was significantly higher than individual component imprecision (3.9-4.5% CV).
- Retrospective analysis of 84 QC determinations showed varying failure patterns for PHIc and components based on standard deviations used for Westgard rules.
- Simulated bias in component assays demonstrated nonlinear changes in the PHIc metric.
Conclusions:
- An additional calculated phi QC measure (PHIc) is proposed to effectively monitor MAAA precision and bias.
- Calculated index controls offer a complementary QC approach applicable to other MAAA indices.
- Implementing PHIc can enhance the accuracy and reliability of disease risk scores derived from MAAAs.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Statistical Analysis: Overview
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Significance Testing: Overview
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of PI Control
Acting as a low-pass filter, the PI controller slows the system's response and extends settling times. This requires careful...
Statgraphics

