Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Assessing the Utility of the DAPT Score and PRECISE-DAPT Score in Determining the Appropriateness of Dual
Abhishek Singh1, M A Hussain2, Shyam Chand Chaudhary2
1Department of Cardiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow 226003, India.
Insights
The dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) score and PRECISE-DAPT score effectively determined appropriate DAPT duration for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Most patients received appropriate DAPT, with self-advised interruptions being common.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is crucial after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
- Determining optimal DAPT duration balances ischemic event prevention and bleeding risk.
- The DAPT score and PRECISE-DAPT score are available tools to guide DAPT decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the appropriateness of DAPT duration in AMI patients undergoing PCI using the DAPT and PRECISE-DAPT scores.
- To assess the concordance between these two scoring systems in clinical practice.
- To analyze bleeding events and reasons for DAPT interruption in this patient cohort.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 235 AMI patients undergoing PCI.
- Calculation of DAPT and PRECISE-DAPT scores for all patients.
- Assessment of DAPT appropriateness based on score recommendations and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) classification for bleeding events.
Main Results:
- High prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors including smoking, diabetes, and hypertension.
- 81% of patients with DAPT score ≥ 2 and 77.24% with PRECISE-DAPT score < 25 were appropriately prescribed DAPT.
- A significant association was observed between DAPT and PRECISE-DAPT scores.
- The incidence of bleeding events was 7.23%, with 5.1% classified as BARC Type 1.
Conclusions:
- Both DAPT and PRECISE-DAPT scores are valuable tools for guiding DAPT recommendations in AMI patients post-PCI.
- The scores demonstrated good agreement in identifying appropriate DAPT durations.
- Self-advised drug interruptions were the primary reason for discontinuing DAPT.
Abstract:
Background: Utilizing the two available prediction models, i.e., the dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) score and predicting bleeding complication in patients undergoing stent implantation and subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score, we aimed to determine the appropriateness of the DAPT in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 235 patients of AMI and for all the patients and thorough information regarding history, risk factors, and medications were collected. Both DAPT and PRECISE-DAPT scores were calculated. The patients were divided by their recommended cutoffs and the appropriateness of the duration of the recommended DAPT was measured based on the observed scores. Bleeding academic research consortium (BARC) classification was used to define the bleeding events. In the patients with DAPT score ≥ 2 and PRESICE-DAPT < 25, the prolonged use of DAPT was recommended. Results: Overall, 235 patients, predominantly male (78.7%), with baseline characteristics exhibiting high rate of smoking (31.1%), diabetes (35.3%), and hypertension (32.8%) were found. The widely prescribed DAPT combination was aspirin with clopidogrel (72.3% at discharge and 46% on current use). Among all the enrolled patients, 163 patients were on DAPT while 71 were on single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT). A significant association between DAPT and PRECISE-DAPT scores was noted in terms of SAPT and DAPT. The appropriateness of DAPT was checked based on the scores, where 81% of the patients with DAPT ≥ 2 and 77.24% with PRECISE-DAPT score < 25 were appropriately prescribed with DAPT. The primary reason for drug interruptions was self-advised. The incidence of bleeding events was observed to be 7.23%, among which 5.1% had Type 1 bleeding according to BARC. Conclusion: Both DAPT and PRECISE-DAPT scores could be used to determine the appropriateness of the recommendations of DAPT in patients with AMI or undergoing PCI.
More Related Videos
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT