Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Do tools aimed at avoiding hospital admission operate at different mortality thresholds? A systematic review
Ciara Harris1, Agnieszka Ignatowicz2, Thomas Knight2
1Warwick Applied Health, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham.
Objective:
To determine whether front-door discharge decision tools operate at different mortality thresholds.
Methods:
Three databases searched, for studies testing, deriving or validating front-door risk prediction tools or discharge decision aids, with defined discharge 'cut-off', reporting mortality or readmission rates. Studies supporting tools' inclusion in national guidelines were also included.
Results:
Twenty-four studies were included, frequently for acute chest pain. Mortality rates among those discharged based on tools 0-1.7%. Eight studies reported readmission rates, 0-8% among those discharged early or deemed low-risk.
Conclusion:
Although mortality rates were lower for those deemed low-risk by decision aids than those admitted or control groups, readmission rates tended to be higher among low-risk or discharged patients, than among control group or admitted patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Truncation in Survival Analysis
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...

