Should we delay leaf water potential measurements after excision? Dehydration or equilibration?
Alicia V Perera-Castro1,2, Jaime Puértolas3, Beatriz Fernández-Marín3,4
1Department of Botany, Ecology and Plant Physiology, Universidad de La Laguna (ULL), La Laguna, Canary Islands, 38200, Spain. aperera@fg.ull.es.
BMC Plant Biology
|November 8, 2024
Summary
Leaf water potential (Ψw) measurement is not overestimated after excision, as water potential disequilibrium dissipates quickly. Minimizing water loss during storage, especially with a hydrophobic layer, is key for accurate plant water status determination.
Area of Science:
- Plant Physiology
- Plant Water Relations
- Drought Stress Physiology
Background:
- Accurate leaf water potential (Ψw) determination is vital for understanding plant responses to water deficit.
- Post-excision water potential decline has been linked to the equilibration of pre-excision Ψw gradients.
- This study investigates the impact of re-equilibration on Ψw determination.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the influence of potential re-equilibration on leaf water potential (Ψw) determination after excision.
- To evaluate different storage methods for minimizing water loss and its effect on Ψw measurement.
- To determine if pre-excision transpiration rates affect post-excision Ψw decline.
Main Methods:
- Monitoring leaf water potential (Ψw) and relative water content decline after excision.
- Employing different leaf storage methods, including covering with a hydrophobic layer (vaseline).
- Comparing Ψw decline under low evaporative demand conditions with varying storage techniques.
Main Results:
- Leaf Ψw decline during storage was significantly reduced by covering leaves with a hydrophobic layer.
- Residual water loss varied among species, potentially due to morpho-physiological traits.
- Pre-excision transpiration rate did not influence the magnitude of post-excision Ψw decline when water loss was minimized.
Conclusions:
- Water potential disequilibrium across a leaf dissipates rapidly after excision, preventing Ψw overestimation.
- Storage under low evaporative demand shows variable effectiveness across species.
- Using a hydrophobic layer is a viable method for preserving leaf water potential during storage.
Related Concept Videos
Responses to Drought and Flooding
10.6K
Water plays a significant role in the life cycle of plants. However, insufficient or excess of water can be detrimental and pose a serious threat to plants.
10.6K
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss
25.1K
Though evaporation from plant leaves drives transpiration, it also results in loss of water. Because water is critical for photosynthetic reactions and other cellular processes, evolutionary pressures on plants in different environments have driven the acquisition of adaptations that reduce water loss.
25.1K
Tonicity in Plants
29.8K
Plant cells maintain appropriate osmotic balance in extreme conditions. For instance, plants in dry environments store water in vacuoles, limit the opening of their stoma, and have thick, waxy cuticles to prevent unnecessary water loss. Some species of plants that live in salty environments store salt in their roots. As a result, water osmosis occurs in the root from the surrounding soil.
Tonicity
Tonicity describes the capacity of a cell to lose or gain water depending on the solute...
Tonicity
Tonicity describes the capacity of a cell to lose or gain water depending on the solute...
29.8K
Responses to Heat and Cold Stress
13.4K
Every organism has an optimum temperature range within which healthy growth and physiological functioning can occur. At the ends of this range, there will be a minimum and maximum temperature that interrupt biological processes.
13.4K
Regulation of Transpiration by Stomata
27.8K
During photosynthesis, plants acquire the necessary carbon dioxide and release the produced oxygen back into the atmosphere. Openings in the epidermis of plant leaves is the site of this exchange of gasses. A single opening is called a stoma—derived from the Greek word for “mouth.” Stomata open and close in response to a variety of environmental cues.
27.8K


