Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2025

A Step-by-Step Implementation of DeepBehavior, Deep Learning Toolbox for Automated Behavior Analysis
Published on: February 6, 2020
GCS-YOLOv8: A Lightweight Face Extractor to Assist Deepfake Detection
Ruifang Zhang1,2, Bohan Deng1,2, Xiaohui Cheng3
1Key Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing and Automation Technology, Education Department of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China.
Abstract:
To address the issues of target feature blurring and increased false detections caused by high compression rates in deepfake videos, as well as the high computational resource requirements of existing face extractors, we propose a lightweight face extractor to assist deepfake detection, GCS-YOLOv8. Firstly, we employ the HGStem module for initial downsampling to address the issue of false detections of small non-face objects in deepfake videos, thereby improving detection accuracy. Secondly, we introduce the C2f-GDConv module to mitigate the low-FLOPs pitfall while reducing the model's parameters, thereby lightening the network. Additionally, we add a new P6 large target detection layer to expand the receptive field and capture multi-scale features, solving the problem of detecting large-scale faces in low-compression deepfake videos. We also design a cross-scale feature fusion module called CCFG (CNN-based Cross-Scale Feature Fusion with GDConv), which integrates features from different scales to enhance the model's adaptability to scale variations while reducing network parameters, addressing the high computational resource requirements of traditional face extractors. Furthermore, we improve the detection head by utilizing group normalization and shared convolution, simplifying the process of face detection while maintaining detection performance. The training dataset was also refined by removing low-accuracy and low-resolution labels, which reduced the false detection rate. Experimental results demonstrate that, compared to YOLOv8, this face extractor achieves the AP of 0.942, 0.927, and 0.812 on the WiderFace dataset's Easy, Medium, and Hard subsets, representing improvements of 1.1%, 1.3%, and 3.7% respectively. The model's parameters and FLOPs are only 1.68 MB and 3.5 G, reflecting reductions of 44.2% and 56.8%, making it more effective and lightweight in extracting faces from deepfake videos.
Related Concept Videos
Extraction: Advanced Methods
Masking and Demasking Agents
There are many masking agents, such as cyanide, fluoride, triethanolamine, thiourea, and 2,3-bis(sulfanyl)propan-1-ol (formerly 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol), with the masking agent chosen based on...
Deconvolution
Deconvolution involves several mathematical techniques to derive the impulse response. One common approach is polynomial division. In this method, the input and output sequences are treated as coefficients of...
Force Classification
Contact and non-contact forces are two of the most widely used categories of forces. As the name suggests, contact forces require physical contact between two objects to act upon each other. Examples of contact forces include frictional,...
Downsampling
The Fourier transform of the decimated sequence reveals a combination of scaled and shifted versions of the original spectrum. This...
Detection of Black Holes
Their closest cousins are neutron stars, which are composed almost entirely of neutrons packed against each other, making them extremely dense. A neutron star has the same mass as the Sun but its diameter is only a few kilometers. Therefore, the escape velocity from their surface is close to the speed of light.
Not until the 1960s, when the first neutron...

