Dual-Fluoroscopy vs. Single-Fluoroscopy in Balloon Kyphoplasty: A Study of Efficiency and Safety

Background: Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are the most prevalent type of osteoporotic fractures, often causing significant pain, morbidity, and mortality. Vertebral augmentation procedures like balloon kyphoplasty (BK) are effective in treating VCFs. These procedures are typically performed using a single fluoroscopy machine (SF) for anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views. We have implemented a dual-fluoroscopy (DF) technique to reduce procedure time and radiation exposure. The goal of this study was to determine whether dual-fluoroscopy could optimize surgical efficiency without compromising safety, offering a more effective alternative to traditional single-fluoroscopy methods. Methods: This retrospective study included 126 patients who underwent BK with either SF (n = 74, 58.7%) or DF (n = 52, 41.3%) between 2020 and 2024. We collected data on procedure duration per pedicle (PDPP), radiation exposure (reference air kerma and dose-area product [DAP]), and radiation duration. A sub-analysis of post-learning phase cases was performed. Results: A learning curve was identified for the first 24 cases and 15 cases using the SF technique and DF technique, respectively, which was followed by a stabilization in procedure duration per pedicle (Levene's statistic = 10.623, p = 0.002 for SD difference, p < 0.001 for mean PDPP difference). After the completion of the learning phase for both techniques, the DF group demonstrated a significantly shorter PDPP (11.83 ± 4.3 vs. 14.03 ± 5.57 min, p = 0.049). No significant differences were found in radiation exposure, including radiation duration (p = 0.577), reference air kerma, or DAP. Conclusions: Dual-fluoroscopy significantly reduces procedure time after the learning curve is overcome, improving efficiency without increasing radiation exposure. This technique holds promise for optimizing kyphoplasty workflow and safety, supporting broader clinical adoption.