Comparative analysis of 333 proGAV® and proGAV 2.0® adjustable valves in pediatric hydrocephalus treatment: survival

Mohammed Issa1,2, Filippo Paggetti3,4,5, Clara Dannehl3,4

  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. mohammed.issa@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Acta Neurochirurgica
|November 9, 2024
PubMed

Insights

The ProGAV2.0 valve shows better outcomes than the ProGAV valve for pediatric hydrocephalus treatment, with fewer complications and adjustment issues. Both valves offer acceptable survival rates within three years.

Area of Science:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Hydrocephalus is a common neurological condition in children, often managed with shunts.
  • Adjustable pressure valves like ProGAV and ProGAV2.0 are frequently used for pediatric hydrocephalus.
  • Comparing valve performance is crucial for optimizing treatment outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the ProGAV and ProGAV2.0 adjustable valves in pediatric hydrocephalus treatment.
  • To analyze differences in survival rates, complication rates, and adjustment difficulties.
  • To evaluate the clinical and radiological improvements associated with each valve type.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective study of pediatric patients receiving ProGAV or ProGAV2.0 valve implantation (August 2008 - August 2020).
  • Comparative analysis included age, gender, follow-up duration, complication and survival rates, and adjustment parameters.
  • Follow-up duration was a maximum of 3 years for all valves.

Main Results:

  • 333 pediatric cases analyzed (173 ProGAV, 160 ProGAV2.0).
  • ProGAV2.0 showed significantly lower early post-implantation complication rates (9.4% vs. 22%) and fewer adjustment difficulties (p=0.041).
  • ProGAV2.0 demonstrated enhanced clinical and radiological improvement within 6 months (p=0.001).

Conclusions:

  • ProGAV2.0 valve exhibits superior performance in pediatric hydrocephalus treatment compared to ProGAV.
  • The ProGAV2.0 valve is associated with reduced complication and maladjustment rates.
  • Both valves provide acceptable three-year survival rates (ProGAV: 65.3%, ProGAV2.0: 71.3%).
Abstract