Comparative analysis of 333 proGAV® and proGAV 2.0® adjustable valves in pediatric hydrocephalus treatment: survival and complication rate assessment
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Protocol for Relative Hydrodynamic Assessment of Tri-leaflet Polymer Valves
Published on: October 17, 2013
Mohammed Issa1,2, Filippo Paggetti3,4,5, Clara Dannehl3,4
1Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. mohammed.issa@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Insights
The ProGAV2.0 valve shows better outcomes than the ProGAV valve for pediatric hydrocephalus treatment, with fewer complications and adjustment issues. Both valves offer acceptable survival rates within three years.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Pediatric Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Hydrocephalus is a common neurological condition in children, often managed with shunts.
- Adjustable pressure valves like ProGAV and ProGAV2.0 are frequently used for pediatric hydrocephalus.
- Comparing valve performance is crucial for optimizing treatment outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the ProGAV and ProGAV2.0 adjustable valves in pediatric hydrocephalus treatment.
- To analyze differences in survival rates, complication rates, and adjustment difficulties.
- To evaluate the clinical and radiological improvements associated with each valve type.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of pediatric patients receiving ProGAV or ProGAV2.0 valve implantation (August 2008 - August 2020).
- Comparative analysis included age, gender, follow-up duration, complication and survival rates, and adjustment parameters.
- Follow-up duration was a maximum of 3 years for all valves.
Main Results:
- 333 pediatric cases analyzed (173 ProGAV, 160 ProGAV2.0).
- ProGAV2.0 showed significantly lower early post-implantation complication rates (9.4% vs. 22%) and fewer adjustment difficulties (p=0.041).
- ProGAV2.0 demonstrated enhanced clinical and radiological improvement within 6 months (p=0.001).
Conclusions:
- ProGAV2.0 valve exhibits superior performance in pediatric hydrocephalus treatment compared to ProGAV.
- The ProGAV2.0 valve is associated with reduced complication and maladjustment rates.
- Both valves provide acceptable three-year survival rates (ProGAV: 65.3%, ProGAV2.0: 71.3%).
Objective:
ProGAV and ProGAV2.0 adjustable valves are extensively used for treating hydrocephalus in pediatric patients. This study aims to conduct a comprehensive comparison between these two valves concerning their survival and complication rates.
Methods:
This retrospective study included all pediatric patients who underwent ProGAV or ProGAV2.0 valve implantation at our neurosurgical clinic from August 2008 to August 2020. A comparative analysis was performed considering age, gender, follow-up duration, complication and survival rates, adjustments, spontaneous adjustments, and adjustment difficulty rates. All valves were followed up for a maximum of 3 years.
Results:
Inclusion involved 333 cases (mean age of 5.4 ± 5.1 years; 54.1% males), comprising 173 cases (52.0%) with ProGAV valve implantation and 160 cases (48.0%) with ProGAV 2.0. Early complications within the first month post-implantation were observed in 51 cases (15.3%). No significant differences were noted in valve implantation indications, age distribution, or survival duration (27.1 vs. 27.8 months, p = 0.629) between the two groups. Predominant indications for implantation were post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus and aqueduct stenosis for both valve types. Notably, both valves showed non-significantly different explantation rates during the first three years after implantation (34.7% vs. 29.7%, p < 0.289). However, there was a significantly higher early post-implantation complication rate (22% vs. 9.4%, p = 0.002), and a significantly increased association with difficulties in valve adjustments and spontaneous adjustments (p = 0.041 and 0.011, respectively). ProGAV2.0 cases displayed notably enhanced clinical and radiological improvement within the initial 6 months after implantation (p = 0.001 and p = 0.038). Younger children (< 2 years of age) also experienced significantly more valve adjustment difficulties (p = 0.049) and had higher rates of valve explantation (p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
The findings of this study highlight the superior performance of the ProGAV2.0 valve in terms of complication rate and maladjustment rate when employed in the treatment of pediatric hydrocephalus. Both valves demonstrated an acceptable survival rate with 65.3% for ProGAV and 71.3% for ProGAV2.0 within three years of implantation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Cancer Survival Analysis

