Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Clinical-oriented Three-dimensional Gait Analysis Method for Evaluating Gait Disorder
Published on: March 4, 2018
Comparison of the OpenPose system and the reference optoelectronic system for gait analysis of lower-limb angular
Roxane Henry1, Sébastien Cordillet2, Hélène Rauscent2
1Service de chirurgie pédiatrique, CHU Rennes, hôpital Sud, 16 Boulevard de Bulgarie, 35200 Rennes, France; Laboratoire du traitement du signal et de l'image - UMR 1099, Inserm, Université de Rennes, Campus Beaulieu, Bâtiment 22, 263 Avenue du Général Leclerc, 35000 Rennes, France.
Introduction:
Quantitative Gait Analysis (QGA) is the gold-standard for detailed study of lower-limb movement, angles and forces, especially in pediatrics, providing a decision aid for treatment and for assessment of results. However, widespread use of QGA is hindered by the need for specific equipment and trained personnel and high costs. Recently, the OpenPose system used algorithms for 2D video movement analysis, to determine joint points and angles without any supplementary equipment or great expertise. The present study therefore aimed to validate application of OpenPose for gait analysis in children with locomotor pathology, thereby circumventing the limitations of QGA.
Hypothesis:
The OpenPose system is as precise as QGA for measuring lower-limb angles in gait in children.
Materials And Methods:
Gait analysis was studied prospectively, between January and July 2023, in 20 children: 13 boys, 7 girls; mean age, 13 years. There was no selection for pathology or use of walking aids. QGA was performed, measuring joint angles in the hips, knees and ankles. The same measurements were then made using the points obtained on OpenPose. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the two methods.
Results:
There were only slight differences in angle measurements (in degrees) for the knees: right, 0.54 [-0.61; 1.71], p = 0.361; left, -1.09 [-2.16; 0.01], p = 0.051. Differences were greater for the hips (right, 9.32 [8.28; 10.35]; left, 7.54 [6.55; 8.54], p < 0.01) and ankles (right, -6.67 [-7.22; -6.12]; left, -7.07 [-7.60; -6.54], p < 0.01).
Discussion:
OpenPose provided angle values close to those of QGA for the knees in the sagittal plane, independently of pathology and walking aid. In the hips and ankles, on the other hand, differences were too great to allow clinical application of OpenPose.
Level Of Evidence:
IV.
More Related Videos
06:25Paw-Print Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Recordings PrAnCER: A Low-Cost, Open-Access Automated Gait Analysis System for Assessing Motor Deficits
Published on: August 12, 2019
09:37Substantiating Appropriate Motion Capture Techniques for the Assessment of Nordic Walking Gait and Posture in Older Adults
Published on: May 12, 2016