Related Experiment Video For Bayesian analysis
Updated: Jun 7, 2025
Diagnosing Pulmonary Tuberculosis with the Xpert MTB/RIF Test
Published on: April 9, 2012
Accuracy of Xpert and alternative sampling methods to diagnose childhood pulmonary tuberculosis, a prospective cohort
Lou Macaux1, Voahangy Rasolofo2, Sara Eyangoh3
1Unité d'Epidémiologie et de Recherche Clinique, Institut Pasteur de Madagascar, Antananarivo, Madagascar; Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité Mixte de Recherche 2000, Paris, France; Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Hôpital Avicenne, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Bobigny, France.
Objectives:
To estimate the sensitivity and specificity of childhood pulmonary tuberculosis (CPTB) diagnostic tests, including Xpert MTB/RIF and alternative samples such as nasopharyngeal aspirate and stool. We used latent class analysis to overcome the lack of reference standards.
Methods:
We included 1165 children suspected of having CPTB in a prospective cohort study conducted in the Ivory Coast, Madagascar, and Cameroon. We used Bayesian latent class analysis to evaluate the performance of multiple diagnostic tests for CPTB: smear microscopy, mycobacterial culture, and Xpert carried out on different types of samples (sputum after 10 years of age, gastric aspirate before 10 years of age, nasopharyngeal aspirate, and stool), tuberculin skin test, and chest X-ray.
Results:
Median age was 3.5 years (95% credible interval [1.3-8.2]). Smear microscopy was highly specific in all types of samples but lacked sensitivity (sputum 31%; 95% credible interval [18-46]), gastric aspirate 36% [27-45], nasopharyngeal aspirate 24% [17-32], and stool 24% [17-32]). Culture sensitivity was slightly higher in gastric (75% [65-83]) than in nasopharyngeal aspirate (64% [54-72]). Xpert sensitivity was similar in gastric (69% [59-78]) and nasopharyngeal aspirate (66% [57-74]) but lower in sputum (58% [43-74]) and stools (53% [44-62]). Xpert was highly specific in all respiratory samples (sputum 96% [96-100], gastric aspirate 100% [99-100], and nasopharyngeal aspirate 100% [99-100]).
Discussion:
The Xpert performed on the nasopharyngeal aspirate shows similar accuracy to the culture. It was also similar to that in gastric aspirate. It highlights an interesting CPTB diagnostic combination.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:26Pulmonary Tuberculosis IV
Several diagnostic approaches are used to detect TB. The conventional method is the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), also known as the Mantoux test. However, this method has...
01:28Pulmonary Tuberculosis V
Latent tuberculosis infection occurs when TB bacteria are present in a person's body, but are not causing illness or symptoms. It is not contagious, and preventive treatment is crucial to avoid the...
01:31Pulmonary Tuberculosis III
The first classification is based on the development of the disease, and it includes the following categories:
01:20Sputum Studies II: Culture and Sensitivity
Sputum culture and sensitivity is a medical procedure used to diagnose bacterial infections in the respiratory tract and select the most appropriate antibiotics for treatment. This process involves analyzing sputum samples of thick and opaque secretions produced in the lungs and airways. These samples are collected from patients and then sent to the laboratory for analysis.
The test can identify various pathogens responsible for respiratory infections, including Streptococcus,...
01:27Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
01:29Pulmonary Tuberculosis I
Causative Organism
The primary infectious agent causing tuberculosis is Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a slow-growing, acid-fast, aerobic rod that exhibits sensitivity to heat and ultraviolet light. Instances of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium contributing to the development of TB infection are rare.
Mode of...