Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Cloud-Based Phrase Mining and Analysis of User-Defined Phrase-Category Association in Biomedical Publications
Published on: February 23, 2019
A deep neural network model for classifying pharmacy practice publications into research domains
Samuel O Adeosun1, Afua B Faibille2, Aisha N Qadir2
1Department of Clinical Sciences, High Point University One University Parkway, High Point, NC, 27268, USA; Fred Wilson School of Pharmacy, High Point University One University Parkway, High Point, NC, 27268, USA.
A new Pharmacy Practice Research Domain Classifier (PPRDC) accurately categorizes faculty publications into four domains, outperforming general-purpose large language models (gpLLMs) in bibliometric analysis.
Area of Science:
- Bibliometrics
- Pharmacy Practice Research
- Artificial Intelligence in Academia
Background:
- Pharmacy practice research encompasses clinical, social, and administrative domains, but lacks standardized categorization.
- The Granada Statements highlight the need for consensus on defining research domains.
- Four key domains are proposed: clinical, education, social & administrative, and basic & translational.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a machine learning classifier for categorizing pharmacy practice faculty publications into four defined research domains.
- To evaluate the classifier's performance against state-of-the-art general-purpose large language models (gpLLMs) using a zero-shot approach.
Main Methods:
- A Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model was finetuned using 1000 abstracts (2018-2021) from pharmacy practice faculty publications.
- The developed model, Pharmacy Practice Research Domain Classifier (PPRDC), was compared with 7 leading gpLLMs on 80 randomly selected abstracts (2023).
- Performance was assessed using F1, recall, precision, accuracy, and Cohen's kappa for reproducibility.
Main Results:
- The PPRDC achieved high 5-fold cross-validation metrics: 89.4% F1, 90.2% recall, 89.0% precision, and 95.5% accuracy.
- PPRDC demonstrated perfect reproducibility (Cohen's kappa = 1.0) and significantly outperformed all tested gpLLMs in zero-shot classification.
- Specific F1 scores for PPRDC were: Education (96.2%), Clinical (92.7%), Social (85.8%), and Translational (83.1%).
Conclusions:
- The PPRDC offers superior performance compared to gpLLMs for classifying pharmacy practice research abstracts.
- This tool advances bibliometric studies and supports the Granada Statements' goals by aiding authors and editors in publication-related decisions.
- PPRDC represents a significant step forward in the systematic analysis and categorization of academic research in pharmacy practice.
Related Concept Videos
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Compartment Models
Two primary types of compartment models are recognized: mammillary and catenary. The more...
Drug Distribution: Tissue Binding
For...
Drugs Affecting Neurotransmitter Release or Uptake
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Physiological Models
Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This...

