Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025

A Spine Robotic-Assisted Navigation System for Pedicle Screw Placement
Published on: May 11, 2020
Neurosurgery, Explainable AI, and Legal Liability
Rita Matulionyte1, Eric Suero Molina2,3, Antonio Di Ieva2,4,5,6
1Macquarie Law School, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia. rita.matulionyte@mq.edu.au.
Abstract:
One of the challenges of AI technologies is its "black box" nature, or the lack of explainability and interpretability of these technologies. This chapter explores whether AI systems in healthcare generally, and in neurosurgery specifically, should be explainable, for what purposes, and whether the current XAI ("explainable AI") approaches and techniques are able to achieve these purposes. The chapter concludes that XAI techniques, at least currently, are not the only and not necessarily the best way to achieve trust in AI and ensure patient autonomy or improved clinical decision, and they are of limited significance in determining liability. Instead, we argue, we need more transparency around AI systems, their training and validation, as this information is likely to better achieve these goals.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities I
The legal responsibilities of a nurse regarding informed consent include the following:
Torts I
Intentional...

