Size and Surface Effects in the Ultrafast Dynamics of Strongly Cooperative Spin-Crossover Nanoparticles
Tyler N Haddock1, Teresa Delgado2, Marc Alías-Rodríguez3
1Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
Abstract:
Cooperative photoinduced switching of molecular materials at the nanoscale is still in its infancy. Strongly cooperative spin-crossover nanomaterials are arguably the best prototypes of photomagnetic and volume-changing materials that can be manipulated by short pulses of light. Open questions remain regarding their non-equilibrium dynamics upon light excitation and the role of cooperative elastic interactions in nanoscale systems that are characterized by large surface/volume ratios. Femtosecond-resolved broadband spectroscopy is performed on nanorods of the strongly cooperative Fe-triazole, which undergoes a reversible low-spin to high-spin (HS) phase transition ≈360 K. Supported by density functional theory and mechano-elastic Monte Carlo simulations, a marked difference is observed in the photoswitching dynamics at the surface of the nanoparticles compared with the core. Surprisingly, under low excitation (<2%) conditions, there occurs a transient increase in the HS population at the surface on the picosecond time scale, while the HS population in the core decays concomitantly. These results shed light onto the importance of surface properties and dynamical size limits of nanoscale photoresponsive nanomaterials that can be used in a broad range of applications.
Related Concept Videos
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Population Distribution
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene...


