Monitoring of visual-evoked potentials during fat packing in endoscopic resection of a giant pituitary adenoma
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States.
- 2Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States.
- 3Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States.
- 0Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Visual-evoked potentials (VEPs) may not reliably monitor optic nerve integrity during endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. Careful VEP assessment and anesthetic choice are crucial, especially for patients with pre-existing visual deficits.
Area Of Science
- Neurosurgery
- Ophthalmology
- Neurophysiology
Background
- Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery is a primary approach for sellar pathologies, aiming to decompress optic nerves.
- Visual-evoked potentials (VEPs) are used intraoperatively to monitor optic pathway integrity during these surgeries.
- The reliability and efficacy of VEPs in this context are subject to ongoing research and present heterogeneous data.
Observation
- A case involved an 80-year-old male with a pituitary macroadenoma causing visual deficits.
- During surgery, VEPs decreased, then appeared to improve after partial fat removal, despite paradoxical latency changes.
- Postoperatively, the patient experienced a visual field deficit, necessitating further surgical intervention.
Findings
- The observed VEP improvement was likely an artifact due to noise contamination, creating a false impression of signal enhancement.
- Shortened VEP latencies can be misleading and do not necessarily indicate improved optic nerve function.
- Baseline VEP reproducibility is critical, especially in patients with compromised pre-existing visual fields.
Implications
- Careful interpretation of VEP data, considering baseline reproducibility and potential noise interference, is essential.
- Anesthetic selection plays a role in minimizing electroencephalogram noise that can affect VEP accuracy.
- This case highlights potential pitfalls in using VEPs for intraoperative neuromonitoring during transsphenoidal surgeries for sellar pathologies.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

