Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Process Evaluations for the Scale-Up of Complex Interventions - a Scoping Review
Lekha Rathod1, Martin Heine1,2, Daniel Boateng1,3
1Julius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Process evaluations (PEs) are crucial for scaling up complex health interventions (CHIs). This review highlights that PEs during scale-up often focus on context-specific barriers and facilitators, ideally using continuous, mixed-methods data collection.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Health Services Research
- Implementation Science
Background:
- Complex health interventions (CHIs) are integral to public health and social care.
- Process evaluations (PEs) are vital for understanding CHI implementation, mechanisms of change, and contextual influences.
- Scaling up CHIs presents unique challenges due to their complexity and heterogeneity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe current practices of conducting PEs during the scale-up of CHIs.
- To identify common themes, methods, and outcomes in PEs accompanying CHI scale-up.
- To inform best practices for process evaluation in health intervention scale-up.
Main Methods:
- A scoping review of the literature was performed.
- Searched eight primary data sources for studies on PEs alongside or after CHI scale-up.
- Extracted data on study and intervention characteristics, PE methods, and stakeholder involvement.
Main Results:
- 56 studies were included from 10,538 records, covering seven thematic areas of CHI scale-up.
- Scale-up specific frameworks were rarely used; PEs commonly focused on context-related barriers/facilitators.
- PE data were often collected "once-off" using mixed methods; scale-up strategies included increasing coverage, comprehensiveness, and institutionalization.
Conclusions:
- Variations in PE conduct during CHI scale-up reflect contextual differences and conceptual challenges.
- A continuous, systems-driven PE approach using mixed methods is ideal for informing real-world adaptations.
- PEs should ideally occur alongside scale-up projects to guide strategy adjustments and understand impact mechanisms.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Evaluation
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...

