Kernel machine tests of association using extrinsic and intrinsic cluster evaluation metrics
Alexandria M Jensen1, Peter DeWitt2, Brianne M Bettcher3
1Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States of America.
Plos Computational Biology
|November 11, 2024
Summary
This study introduces a new statistical model to analyze brain network communities and their relationship with outcomes. The method enhances understanding of brain connectivity variations in health and disease.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Network Science
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Mesoscale human brain network topology varies with cognition, disease, and age.
- Existing algorithms detect brain communities but lack robust inference methods.
- Current analysis compares community detection within subjects, limiting generalizability and covariate inclusion.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a novel semiparametric kernel machine regression model for brain network community analysis.
- To enable inference on the association between brain community structures and outcomes, accommodating covariates.
- To generalize brain network analysis to non-linear spaces using similarity-based kernels.
Main Methods:
- Proposed a semiparametric kernel machine regression model for continuous or binary outcomes.
- Modeled covariate effects parametrically and brain connectivity nonparametrically.
- Incorporated similarity measures between network community structures into a kernel distance function.
Main Results:
- The methodology was evaluated on both simulated and real brain network datasets.
- Demonstrated the ability to generalize high-dimensional brain network features to non-linear spaces.
- Facilitated a wider class of distance-based algorithms for network analysis.
Conclusions:
- The proposed model offers a flexible framework for inferring associations between brain network communities and outcomes.
- This approach addresses limitations in current methods by accommodating covariates and enabling broader statistical analysis.
- The study advances the analysis of brain network structures in neuroscience and related fields.
Related Concept Videos
Cluster Sampling Method
11.6K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
11.6K
Multiple Comparison Tests
3.9K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
3.9K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test
1.5K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier. To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
1.5K
Spearman's Rank Correlation Test
683
Spearman's rank correlation test, also known as Spearman's rho, is a nonparametric method for assessing the strength and direction of association between two variables. This test is particularly valuable when the data distribution is unknown or when the assumption of normality does not hold. Named after the English psychologist and statistician Dr. Charles Edward Spearman, it serves as the nonparametric counterpart to Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Spearman's test calculates...
Spearman's test calculates...
683
Compacting Factor test
119
The compacting factor test is a method used to assess the workability of concrete. It is especially suitable for concrete mixes containing aggregates up to one and a half inches in size. This test involves specialized equipment consisting of two truncated cone-shaped hoppers and a cylinder, all with polished interior surfaces to minimize friction.
The procedure begins by placing concrete into the upper hopper without any compaction. Once filled, the bottom door of this hopper is opened,...
The procedure begins by placing concrete into the upper hopper without any compaction. Once filled, the bottom door of this hopper is opened,...
119
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance
262
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance (W), also known as Kendall's W, is a non-parametric statistical measure used to assess the agreement or concordance between multiple raters or judges when they rank a set of items. It is often used when you have ordinal data (ranks) and you want to see if there is consistency or consensus among the raters. It is widely applied in research areas such as psychology, medicine, and social sciences, where multiple judges are asked to rank or rate subjects...
262


