Narrow band imaging in oral cancer did not improve visualisation of the tumour borders: a prospective cohort study

  • 0Department of Otolaryngology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.

|

|

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Narrow-band imaging (NBI) did not better define oral cancer tumor borders compared to white light (WL) in this study. Further research is needed to explore NBI

Area Of Science

  • Oncology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Endoscopy

Background

  • White light (WL) is standard for defining oral cancer tumor borders.
  • Narrow-band imaging (NBI) is an optical endoscopic technique used for other cancers but lacks sufficient evidence for oral cancers.
  • The efficacy of NBI in delineating oral cancer mucosal borders requires further investigation.

Purpose Of The Study

  • To determine if NBI is a superior predictor of true mucosal tumor borders in oral cancers compared to WL.
  • To assess the concordance between NBI-based Takano intrapapillary capillary loop classifications and histopathological findings.

Main Methods

  • A prospective study involving 34 oral cancer patients.
  • Tumor borders were assessed using both NBI and WL during surgical resection.
  • Pathology reports served as the gold standard for comparison.

Main Results

  • NBI identified tumor borders outside WL-defined borders in 26.5% of assessments.
  • However, 55.5% of these NBI-identified borders were false positives.
  • The study included 34 participants after data exclusion.

Conclusions

  • NBI did not demonstrate superior accuracy in delineating mucosal tumor borders of oral cancers compared to WL.
  • Methodological limitations may have impacted the study's findings.
  • Further research is warranted to clarify the role of NBI in oral cancer management.