Narrow band imaging in oral cancer did not improve visualisation of the tumour borders: a prospective cohort study
- Olof Nilsson 1,2, Mathias von Beckerath 2,3,4, Johan Knutsson 2,5,6, Fredrik J Landström 1,2
- Olof Nilsson 1,2, Mathias von Beckerath 2,3,4, Johan Knutsson 2,5,6
- 1Department of Otolaryngology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
- 2School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
- 3Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Unit Head Neck Lung and Skin Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
- 4Department of Clinical Sciences Intervention and Technology, Division of Ear Nose and Throat Diseases, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
- 5Department of Otolaryngology, Vasteras Hospital, Vasteras, Sweden.
- 6Region Vastmanland - Uppsala University, Centre for Clinical Research, Vastmanland Hospital, Vasteras, Sweden.
- 0Department of Otolaryngology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Narrow-band imaging (NBI) did not better define oral cancer tumor borders compared to white light (WL) in this study. Further research is needed to explore NBI
Area Of Science
- Oncology
- Medical Imaging
- Endoscopy
Background
- White light (WL) is standard for defining oral cancer tumor borders.
- Narrow-band imaging (NBI) is an optical endoscopic technique used for other cancers but lacks sufficient evidence for oral cancers.
- The efficacy of NBI in delineating oral cancer mucosal borders requires further investigation.
Purpose Of The Study
- To determine if NBI is a superior predictor of true mucosal tumor borders in oral cancers compared to WL.
- To assess the concordance between NBI-based Takano intrapapillary capillary loop classifications and histopathological findings.
Main Methods
- A prospective study involving 34 oral cancer patients.
- Tumor borders were assessed using both NBI and WL during surgical resection.
- Pathology reports served as the gold standard for comparison.
Main Results
- NBI identified tumor borders outside WL-defined borders in 26.5% of assessments.
- However, 55.5% of these NBI-identified borders were false positives.
- The study included 34 participants after data exclusion.
Conclusions
- NBI did not demonstrate superior accuracy in delineating mucosal tumor borders of oral cancers compared to WL.
- Methodological limitations may have impacted the study's findings.
- Further research is warranted to clarify the role of NBI in oral cancer management.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

