Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

110
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
110
Forgetting01:21

Forgetting

56
Forgetting is an intrinsic aspect of human memory, characterized by the gradual loss or inaccessibility of information over time. Hermann Ebbinghaus, a pioneering psychologist, extensively studied this phenomenon and formulated the forgetting curve. This curve illustrates that memory loss occurs rapidly immediately after learning and then decelerates over time. Several mechanisms contribute to forgetting, including encoding failure, storage decay, retrieval failure, and interference.
Encoding...
56
Tip-of-the-Tongue Phenomenon01:10

Tip-of-the-Tongue Phenomenon

109
The tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) phenomenon is a cognitive experience characterized by a temporary inability to retrieve specific information from memory despite having a strong feeling of knowing the information. Although individuals cannot access the target word or detail, they frequently recall related elements, such as its initial letter, syllable count, or context. This partial retrieval often causes frustration, as one might recognize a familiar face or know that a name starts with a specific...
109

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improving Memory Search Through Model-Based Cue Selection.

Psychological science·2024
Same author

SEGreg: a database for human specifically expressed genes and their regulations in cancer and normal tissue.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2018
Same author

PRRT2 mutations in a cohort of Chinese families with paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia and genotype-phenotype correlation reanalysis in literatures.

The International journal of neuroscience·2017
Same author

[Anxiety and its inducing factors in men undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer].

Zhonghua nan ke xue = National journal of andrology·2017
Same author

Sandwich-structured composite fibrous membranes with tunable porous structure for waterproof, breathable, and oil-water separation applications.

Journal of colloid and interface science·2017
Same author

TaNTF2, a contributor for wheat resistance to the stripe rust pathogen.

Plant physiology and biochemistry : PPB·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

7.9K

A context-based model of collaborative inhibition during memory search.

Hemali Angne1, Charlotte A Cornell2, Qiong Zhang3,4,5

  • 1Department of Computer Science, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, Piscataway, 08854, USA.

Scientific Reports
|November 12, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Collaborative recall leads to remembering less information than individual recall, a phenomenon known as collaborative inhibition. A new computational model explains this effect by how shared retrieval cues cause memory contexts to converge, hindering effective memory search.

Keywords:
Collaborative inhibitionComputational modelingGroup recallMemory search

More Related Videos

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

13.6K
How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

7.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

7.9K
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

13.6K
How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

7.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Collaborative recall often results in lower memory performance than individual recall, termed collaborative inhibition.
  • Existing models do not fully explain the mechanisms behind this memory deficit in group settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a computational model explaining the collaborative inhibition effect in free recall tasks.
  • To investigate how shared retrieval cues influence memory performance in collaborative recall.

Main Methods:

  • Extended the Context Maintenance and Retrieval (CMR) model to simulate collaborative recall.
  • Incorporated the concept of using others' recall as external retrieval cues.
  • Tested the model against existing empirical data on group recall across various sizes (2-16 individuals).

Main Results:

  • The model successfully replicated the collaborative inhibition effect and differences in memory performance between individual and group recall.
  • The model captured recall patterns like recency and semantic clustering.
  • Model simulations indicated that converging memory contexts among collaborators constrain effective memory search, negatively impacting recall.

Conclusions:

  • Collaborative recall inhibition arises from the convergence of memory search contexts among individuals.
  • The proposed model provides a mechanistic explanation for collaborative inhibition, highlighting the role of shared external cues.